Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Pete, 20 So. 2d 368.

23 citing documents.

State v. Gardner 844 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
[(1945)]; State v. Chanet, 209 La.
State v. Shelton 545 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
829 , (1959); , (1944); State v. Craig, 158 La.
State v. Woljar 477 So. 2d 80 La. 1985
State v. Hardy 376 So. 2d 131 La. 1979
(1964), an early case interpreting R.S.
Davenport v. Hardy 349 So. 2d 858 La. 1977
State v. Reado, La., (1974); , (1944); Campagna v. City of Baton Rouge, 165 La.
State v. Comeaux 319 So. 2d 897 La. 1975
319 , (1944); , (1944); 10 La.L.
State v. Heck 307 So. 2d 332 La. 1975
319 , (1944); , (1944); 10 La.L.Rev.
State v. Mann 202 So. 2d 259 La. 1967
20 * State v. Chanet, 209 La.
State v. Deutch 161 So. 2d 730 La. 1964
876 , ; Barnett v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans, La.App., ; , ; Marino v. City of Baton Rouge, La.App., ), convinces us that our finding, supra, is correct.
State v. Barnes 134 So. 2d 890 La. 1961
State v. Morgan 116 So. 2d 682 La. 1959
Fallon v. New Orleans Police Department 115 So. 2d 844 La. 1959
State Ex Rel. Department of Highways v. MacAluso 106 So. 2d 455 La. 1958
Ricks v. Department of State Civil Service, 200 La.
State v. Straughan 87 So. 2d 523 La. 1956
. , ; State v. Chanet, 209 La.
State v. Holmes 65 So. 2d 890 La. 1953
State v. Roshto 62 So. 2d 268 La. 1952
this court upheld an information which was attacked on the ground that it did not contain the essential averment required by art. 14:67 of the LSA-Criminal Code defining the crime of “theft”.
State v. Wright 41 So. 2d 76 La. 1949
202 , ; , ; State v. Ward, 208 La.
Roberts v. Caddo Parish School Board 34 So. 2d 916 La. 1948
State v. Truby 29 So. 2d 758 La. 1947
57 ; State v. Pete, 1944, , ; State v. Varnado, 1945, 208 La.
State v. Smith 28 So. 2d 487 La. 1946
that Article 67 of the Criminal Code, defining theft so as to include all crimes constituting culpable taking of anything of value of another, without the owner’s consent, including larceny, confidence games, embezzlement, and obtaining money or property by false pretenses, was not unconstitutional on
State v. Chanet 24 So. 2d 670 La. 1946
895 , ; , ; perjury, State v. Abeny, 168 La.
State v. Davis 23 So. 2d 801 La. 1945
I concur in the conclusion reached in the majority opinion that gambling as defined in Article 90 of the Louisiana Criminal Code is neither vague nor unconstitutional for the reasons urged in the several motions and pleas filed by the defendant, all ■of which have been previously adjudicated upon by this court in the .cases of State v. Pete, 206 La, 1078, , and State v. Varnado, La.Sup., , both of which decisions I had the privilege of writing, but I cannot subscribe to the conclusion reached in
State v. Varnado 23 So. 2d 106 La. 1944
it was held that a bill of information which charged merely that the defendant had committed “the ■theft of an automobile, of the value of Twelve Hundred and no/100 ($1200.00) Dollars, the property of Gordons Drug Store, Inc.,” was a valid bill of information, and'that the defendant’s motion to q