Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Plaquemines Oil & Development Co. v. State, 23 So. 2d 171.

14 citing documents.

  • WHITAKER CONST. CO. INC. v. Larkin Dev. Corp. 775 So. 2d 571 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2000
    Plaquemines Oil & , (1945).
  • TRAINA PLUMBING & HEATING CONTRACTORS, INC. v. Palmer 580 So. 2d 525 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1991
    See , (1945); Book v. Schoonmaker, 210 La.
  • Garnett v. Battistella 485 So. 2d 929 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    like instruments, the intentions of the parties must be gathered from inspection of the instrument without the aid of extrinsic evidence, if their intentions can be thus ascertained, but, if an instrument is so ambiguous as to leave the mind in doubt as to what the parties intended, extrinsic evidence may be resorted to as an aid in construction ...” , (1945).
  • Placid Oil Co. v. Young 246 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    Plaquemines Oil & , (1945); Holloway Gravel Co. v. McKowen, 200 La.
  • Petition of Sewerage & Water Bd. of New Orleans 243 So. 2d 809 La. 1971
    Plaquemines Oil & , 23 So.
  • Marcann Outdoor, Inc. v. Hargrove 140 So. 2d 815 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    386 , ; Plaquemines Oil & , ; Rudman v. Dupuis, 206 La.
  • Campbell v. Thomas 140 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
  • Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. California Co. 132 So. 2d 845 La. 1961
    La.Civ.Code Art. 1956; Plaquemines Oil & , .
  • Esso Standard Oil Co. v. Texas & New Orleans R. Co. 127 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    242 ; Plaquemines Oil & Development Co. v. State, 1945, , .
  • James v. Le Blanc 95 So. 2d 175 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Article 1956, LSA-C.C.; Plaquemines Oil & , ; Metcalfe v. Green, 140 La.
  • Dufrene v. Tracy 94 So. 2d 297 La. 1957
    341 , ; Plaquemines Oil & , ; Mire v. Haas, La.App., 174 So.
  • Dupre v. Dupre 72 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    “ ‘It is expressly provided in the Revised Civil Code “That courts are bound to give legal effect to all such contracts according to the true intent of all the parties” and this “intent is to be determined by the words of the contract, when these are clear and explicit and lead to no absurd consequences.” Article 1945.’ ” “In the case of Plaquemines Oil & , , the Court held: “ ‘(2, 3) It is true that, in the execution of deeds and like instruments, the-intentions of the parties must foe gath
  • Rosenthal v. Gauthier 69 So. 2d 367 La. 1953
    [Authorities.]” Plaquemines Oil & , .
  • Corona v. Corona 59 So. 2d 889 La. 1952
    Plaquemines Oil & , .