Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite National Bank of Commerce v. Board of Sup'rs, 20 So. 2d 264.

15 citing documents.

  • Anne Lind & Assoc. v. ORLEANS PRIVATE IND. COUNCIL 673 So. 2d 227 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1996
    the Supreme Court stated: In Act No. 145 of 1876, as well as in Act No. 7 of the Extra Session of 1921, it is specifically stated that the Board of Supervisors of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College "shall be a body corporate * * * with the right, as such, to
  • State v. All Pro Paint & Body Shop, Inc. 639 So. 2d 707 La. 1994
    829, 844 , (1960); , (1944); City of Baton Rouge v. Shilg, 198 La.
  • State v. Broom 439 So. 2d 357 La. 1983
    829 , (1960); , (1944); and City of Baton Rouge v. Shilg, 198 La.
  • State v. Union Tank Car Co. 439 So. 2d 377 La. 1983
    829 , , (1944); City of Baton Rouge v. Shilg, 198 La.
  • State v. Rodriguez 379 So. 2d 1084 La. 1980
    829 , (1960); , (1944); City of Baton Rouge v. Shilg, 198 La.
  • Dickerson v. Hennen 249 So. 2d 251 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, 1944, , ; A. Sulka & Company v. City of New Orleans, 1945, 208 La.
  • Pettit v. Penn 180 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1966
    97 , (1942); National Bank of Commerce, etc. v. Board of Sup'rs, etc., , (1944); , La.App., 1st Cir.1955.
  • Louisiana State Board of Embalmers v. Britton 154 So. 2d 389 La. 1963
    See National Bank of Commerce v. Board of Sup’rs, , .
  • Woodard v. Reily 152 So. 2d 41 La. 1963
    National Bank of Commerce in New Orleans v. Board of Sup’rs, etc., , .
  • Michell v. Louisiana State Board of Optometry Exam. 146 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    See National Bank of Commerce of New Orleans v. The Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University, Agricultural and Mechanical College, , 20 So.
  • State v. Morgan 116 So. 2d 682 La. 1959
    35 , L.R.A.1916A, 1228.” , 20 So.Zd 264, 270, we said: “ ‘The modern tendency is to be more liberal in permitting grants of discretion to administrative bodies or officers in order to facilitate the administration of laws as the complexity of economic and governmental conditions increases’.
  • State v. Morrow 92 So. 2d 70 La. 1956
    this court quoted with approval from American Jurisprudence, as follows: • “ ‘The modern tendency is to be more liberal in permitting grants' of discretion to administrative bodies or officers in order to facilitate the administration of laws as the complexity of economic and governmental *583 co
  • Parker v. Board of Barber Examiners 84 So. 2d 80 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
  • Merrett v. Shreveport Municipal Fire & Police Civil Service Board 72 So. 2d 519 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, 1944, , ; A. Sulka & Company v. City of New Orleans, 1945, 208 La.
  • Smith v. Town of Vinton 25 So. 2d 237 La. 1946
    that a result of that kind was not contemplated, the Legislature of 1944, by Act 285, provided that the discussed requirement “shall not apply to purchases made in the ordinary course of administration on terms of credit not to exceed ninety days.” What the Legislature had in mind in the enactment of the 1935 , .