Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Singer, 23 So. 2d 184.

21 citing documents.

Deliberto v. Deliberto 400 So. 2d 1096 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
1073 , (1957); , (1945).
Richard v. Richard 383 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Art. 2408: , (1945); (La.App.
Cookmeyer v. Cookmeyer 354 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
2408 by showing "the value of the increase or ameliorations", i. e., the enhancement in the separate property's value; Succession of Singer, 1945, , .
Succession of Gabriel 344 So. 2d 24 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
of Singer, , (1945) the executrix-usufructuary also sold some of the succession assets for the purpose of paying debts.
Fontenot v. Fontenot 339 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
Succession of Dukes v. Williams 285 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
Thus the husband’s only entitlement arising from use of community funds is to half the resulting enhancement in value; , (1945).
Succession of Young 205 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
and cases therein cited.
Williams v. Williams 199 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
(1945); Williams v. Williams, 215 La.
Succession of Jones 193 So. 2d 352 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
entitled to the reward of one half of the value of the increase or ameliorations, if it be proved that the increase or ameliorations be the result of the common labor, expenses or industry; but there shall be no reward due, if it be proved that the increase is due only to the ordinary course of things, to the rise in the value of property, or to the chances of trade.” In the , , the Supreme Court interpreted Article 2408, supra, as follows: “The law is well settled that improvements erected dur
Guillory v. Desormeaux 166 So. 2d 575 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
1 Cir., ; , ; Payton v. Jones, La.App.Orl., ; Peters v. Klein, 161 La.
Simon v. Simon 138 So. 2d 260 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
See: , (1945); Funderburk v. Funderburk, 214 La.
Winston v. Winston 130 So. 2d 165 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Funderburk v. Funderburk, 214 La.
Brown & Blackwood v. Ricou-Brewster Building Co. 121 So. 2d 70 La. 1960
We believe that the furtherance of justice (Louisiana Code of Practice, Article 906; , ; Klopstock & Co. v. United Fruit Co., 171 La.
Succession of Rusciana 96 So. 2d 1 La. 1957
349 ; and , .” Article 906 of the Code of Practice provides that: “ * * * if the court shall think it not possible to pronounce definitively on the cause, in the state in which it is, either because the parties have failed to adduce the necessary testimony, or because the inferior court refused to receive it, or ot
Abunza v. Olivier 88 So. 2d 815 La. 1956
Funderburk v. Funderburk, 214 La.
Abraham v. Abraham 87 So. 2d 735 La. 1956
Coney v. Coney 56 So. 2d 841 La. 1951
ven; (3) payment was made during the marriage of income tax deficiencies of Walton B. Coney for 1943-44, totalling $5,363.61, and there is a presumption that said payment was effected with community funds; (4) although the house and grounds of the Coney residence, the husband's separate property, received improvements, the community was not credited for their enhanced value, , ; Funderburk v. Funderburk, 214 La.
Coney v. Coney 56 So. 2d 841 La. 1951
ven; (3) payment was made during the marriage of income tax deficiencies of Walton B. Coney for 1943-44, totalling $5,363.61, and there is a presumption that said payment was effected with community funds; (4) although the house and grounds of the Coney residence, the husband’s separate property, received improvements, the community was not credited for their enhanced value, , ; Funderburk v. Funderburk, 214 La.
Williams v. Williams 41 So. 2d 736 La. 1949
Under the settled jurisprudence of this state, such improvements form a part of the separate estate of the spouse, , 23 So.
Payton v. Jones 38 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
Code art. 2408; , ; Succession of Meteye, 113 La.
Funderburk v. Funderburk 38 So. 2d 502 La. 1949