DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Gorman., 26 So. 2d 150.

16 citing documents.

  • In re Dauterive 251 So. 3d 1204 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    Succession of Gorman , , , 151 (1946).
  • Succession of James Oliver Love La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
  • Succession of Love 201 So. 3d 1027 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
  • Succession of Harrison 183 So. 3d 579 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2015
    In particular, the court relied upon , (1946), in which a similar donation was upheld where the parties adopted “the most expedient |4way of making and accepting the donation” and the Louisiana Supreme Court found that “the law takes no account of useless formalities.” The trial court also looked to Mr. Harrison’s intent and the “extraordina
  • Succession of Gilbert 668 So. 2d 1212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
    (1946); Arnold v. Fenno, supra.
  • Arnold v. Fenno 652 So. 2d 1078 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • In Re Succession of Caraway 639 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1994
    of Gorman, , (1946); Succ.
  • Succession of Diffey 543 So. 2d 131 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1989
    They cite and , (1946) for the proposition that all that is necessary for a manual gift is the will of the donor to give and the actual possession of the movable property by the donee.
  • France v. Cahill 459 So. 2d 663 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    In order for defendant to prevail she had the burden of proving that decedent intend: ed to make a donation of the money to her, , (1946); and the proof to support a donation must be strong and convincing.
  • Butler v. Reddick 431 So. 2d 396 La. 1983
    See the cases cited in Succession of Miller: , (1946); Gibson v. Hearn, 164 La.
  • Succession of Miller 405 So. 2d 812 La. 1981
  • Pardue v. Turnage 383 So. 2d 804 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • Primeaux v. Libersat 322 So. 2d 147 La. 1975
    [8] Louisiana law has similarly recognized indirect donations (the transfer by a third person to the donee at the donor's order) as being valid as donations, although without the formality required for a direct donation by a donor to a donee if made by a special instrument effecting such transfer: , (1946), Noted, 21 Tul.L.Rev.
  • Succession of Broussard 306 So. 2d 399 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
  • Woodward v. Lewis 292 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
    Cited are: Succession of Woolfolk, supra; Funderburk v. Funderburk, supra; , (1946)
  • Succession of Brewster 259 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
    Succession of Oulliber v. Oulliber, La.App., (4th Cir. 1967); , (1946); Succession of Woolfolk, 225 La.