DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., 23 So. 2d 45.

25 citing documents.

  • Rachal v. Highlands Ins. Co. 355 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    538 , (1948); Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., , (1945); (La.App.
  • Jordan v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY 295 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
    23:1221; , ; Olivier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 241 La.
  • Charleston v. Veri-Fresh Poultry Company, Inc. 273 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., , , and authorities there cited.
  • Kemp v. L. L. Brewton Lumber Co. 168 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    (1945); Hughes v. Enloe, 214 La.
  • Anderson v. Rowan Drilling Company 150 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    23:1221; , ; Olivier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 241 La.
  • Glidden v. Alexandria Concrete Company 137 So. 2d 894 La. 1962
    745 , , is whether the operation of a cementmixer truck is a special skill or trade of such a nature that the loss of the ability to perform it constitutes total and permanent disability under the doctrine enunciated in Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., , and kindred cases.
  • Glidden v. Alexandria Concrete Co. 137 So. 2d 894 La. 1962
    745 , , is whether the operation of a cement-mixer truck is a special skill or trade of such a nature that the loss of the ability to perform it constitutes total and permanent disability under the doctrine enunciated in Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., , and kindred cases.
  • Olivier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 131 So. 2d 50 La. 1961
    Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., , , and authorities there cited.
  • Walters v. General Accident & Fire Assur. Corp., Ltd. 119 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Hughes v. Enloe, 214 La.
  • Powell v. Travelers Insurance Company 117 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    538 , ; Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., , ; Harper v. Crescent Drilling Company, Inc., La.App., ; Moore v. Great American Indemnity Company, La.
  • McAlister v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 87 So. 2d 354 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., , , affirming La.App., ; Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Co., Inc., La.App., ; Myers v. Jahncke Service, Inc., La.App., (writs refused).
  • Bickham v. Lester J. Danner, Inc. 86 So. 2d 564 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Wright v. National Surety Corp., supra; Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., , ; Fruge v. Pacific Employers Ins.
  • Myers v. Jahncke Service 76 So. 2d 436 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    In Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., , , it was pointed out that the disability to perform work of a similar character as that engaged in by the workman at the time of his accident is considered total disability within the meaning of the compensation law, notwithstanding the injured employee may have succeeded in obtaining employment after th
  • Blanchard v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co. 59 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    228 ; Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., , ; Washington v. Independent Ice & Cold Storage Company, 211 La.
  • Mottet v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. 57 So. 2d 218 La. 1952
    Hughes v. Enloe, 214 La.
  • Mottet v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. 57 So. 2d 218 La. 1952
    Hughes v. Enloe, 214 La.
  • Saltzman v. Lone Star Cement Corp. 55 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    Almost identical situations were found in Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Company, La.App., , and in Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., , .
  • Morgan v. American Bitumuls Co. 47 So. 2d 739 La. 1950
    228 ; Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, *979 Inc., , ; Washington v. Independent Ice & Cold Storage Company et al., 211 La.
  • Willet v. American Automobile Ins. Co. 42 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    This phrase has many times been considered by the Supreme Court, the last being in Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., , , 46.
  • Boling v. Bituminous Casualty Corporation 42 So. 2d 567 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    This is clearly reflected in the opinion of the Supreme Court in Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., , , 46, wherein it is said: "This court has held in two cases, namely, Knispel v. Gulf States Utilities Co., 174 La.
  • Gilmore v. George W. Garig Transfer 33 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1947
    228 , 232, 233; , , 46; McKenzie v. Standard Motor Car Co., La.
  • Washington v. Independent Ice & Cold Storage Co. 30 So. 2d 758 La. 1947
    6 ; Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., , ; Wilson v. Union Indemnity Co., La.App., 150 So.
  • Mitchell v. T. J. Moss Tie Co. 27 So. 2d 385 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    In support of this claim, counsel has cited a number of cases, notably, , ; Custer v. New Orleans Paper Box Factory, La.
  • Breland v. Rainold-Van Denburgh 24 So. 2d 882 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    App., ; Id., , , controlled here and that they sustained plaintiff's contention to the effect that he had suffered a permanent total disability.
  • Robinson v. Frost Hardwood Floors 25 So. 2d 312 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1946
    Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., , , 46, is a Supreme Court case affirming court of appeal, , in which the court said: "This court has held in two cases, namely, Knispel v. Gulf States Utilities Co., 174 La.