Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Davis, 23 So. 2d 801.

29 citing documents.

State of Louisiana v. Edward Charles Jackson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
State v. Carr 761 So. 2d 1271 La. 2000
Knights of Columbus, Chapter 2409 v. La. Dept. of Pub. Saf. & Corrections, Div. of State Police 548 So. 2d 936 La. 1989
14:90.2, gambling in public); , (1946); State v. Varnado, 208 La.
State v. Payton 361 So. 2d 866 La. 1978
(1945); see, Sutherland, Statutes and Statutory Construction, § 59.08 (Sands ed. 1974).
State v. Smith 275 So. 2d 733 La. 1973
Rev. 232 and 406, , (1945).
State v. Jackson 217 So. 2d 372 La. 1968
State v. Di Vincenti, 225 La.
State v. Evans 192 So. 2d 103 La. 1966
and State v. Brown, 221 La.
Emmons v. Agricultural Insurance Company 158 So. 2d 594 La. 1963
.” State v. Broadnax, 216 La.
Vaughan v. Dowling 144 So. 2d 371 La. 1962
14:90 recites what “Gambling” is, , , we said that, “Defendant’s alternative contention that the statute forming the basis of the information is vague, indefinite and uncertain and, therefore, un *407 constitutional (all of which is urged under bills of exceptions 1 and 17), is without merit.
State v. Kennedy 95 So. 2d 301 La. 1957
State v. Mattio, 212 La.
State v. Straughan 87 So. 2d 523 La. 1956
3 The state, on the other hand, contends that the information charged gambling un *1043 der Article 235 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as amended by Act 223 of 1944 4 and was, therefore, , , which is controlling.
State v. McQueen 87 So. 2d 727 La. 1955
That the information in the case at bar does not allege a single fact or circumstance upon which the offense is based and there is nothing in it from which the accused can tell definitely, or even guess, what acts he is charged with having done.” *61 In overruling the motion to quash, , .
State v. Hand 82 So. 2d 691 La. 1955
State v. Brown 70 So. 2d 96 La. 1954
State v. Brown 70 So. 2d 96 La. 1954
State v. Roberts 70 So. 2d 100 La. 1953
602 , ; , ; State v. McLean, 216 La.
State v. Brown 59 So. 2d 431 La. 1952
In a recent case before this court, , , 70 Corpus Juris, verbo Witnesses, Section 906 was quoted with approval as follows : “ ‘ * * * It is likewise the rule that the privilege of a witness at a trial of refusing to answer on the ground of self-incrimination is for the protection of the witness, and not for that of any other parti
State v. Broadnax 45 So. 2d 604 La. 1950
State v. Nichols 44 So. 2d 318 La. 1950
410 , ; , , and State v. Iseringhausen, supra.
State v. Simpson 43 So. 2d 585 La. 1949
State *221 v. Davis, , ; State v. Varando, 208 La.
State v. Vallery 38 So. 2d 148 La. 1948
284 , ; , and State v. Valentine, 203 La.
State v. Brown 36 So. 2d 624 La. 1948
sion that “An attempt is a separate but lesser grade of the intended crime; and any person may be convicted of an attempt to commit a crime, although it appears on the trial that the crime intended or attempted was actually perpetrated by such person in pursuance of such attempt.” Moreover, in the comment (which we are admonished to consider in construing the articles of the code, , ; State v. Truby, 211 La.
State v. Damico 35 So. 2d 654 La. 1948
and which was declared in that case to be sufficient.
State v. Broussard 34 So. 2d 883 La. 1948
50 American Jurisprudence, verbo Statutes, Sections 412 and 415; , .
State v. Logan 34 So. 2d 921 La. 1948
It is to be noted in the general comment under Article 46 (which we are admonished to consider in connection with our interpretation of these articles of the code, , ) that “This article is intended to cover cases of false imprisonment, which are not included in the aggravated or simple kidnapping articles.” (Italics ours.)
State v. Le Blanc 34 So. 2d 905 La. 1948
and in State v. Truby et al., 211 La.
State v. Saia 33 So. 2d 665 La. 1947
a case similar to this one, we held that, if certain tickets were improperly admitted, defendant was not prejudiced thereby for the very reason that they were not taken into consideration by the trial judge in arriving at his verdict.
State v. Mattio 31 So. 2d 801 La. 1947
(and decisions therein cited.)
State v. Hall 25 So. 2d 908 La. 1946