Southdown Sugars, Inc. v. Brooks
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., April 19, 1972 261 So. 2d 94; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., January 12, 1970 230 So. 2d 465; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 5, 1930 129 So. 555; La., March 15, 1872 24 La. Ann. 183
Southdown Sugars, Inc. v. Brooks, 69 So. 2d 87 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953).
Authorities cited
Identified automatically; this list may not be exhaustive.
- Milliken & Farwell, Inc. v. Brown 69 So. 2d 85
Opinion text
PER CURIAM. The District Judge has filed an answer in this matter, alleging that the defendants failed to offer any proof or other evidence establishing jurisdictional basis for appeal, which is fully substantiated by reference to the evidence in the case. Therefore for the reasons assigned in the consolidated cases of Milliken & Farwell, Inc., v. Brown, (Godchaux Sugars, Inc., v. Bolotte) La.App., 69 So.2d 85 , the rule herein issued on Nov. 4th is hereby recalled and vacated, and relators’ application is dismissed at their cost.