Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., 24 So. 2d 148.

50 citing documents.

Barber Brothers Contracting Company, LLC v. Capitol City Produce Company, LLC Frank Cushenberry And Xyz Insurance Company C/W … La. 2024
App. 3 Cir. 4/8/98), So.
Bertrand v. Henry 815 So. 2d 868 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2001
(1945); Desadier v. Safeway Ins.
Guilliams v. Succession of Harrel 774 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., , (1945).
Edwards v. Horstman 687 So. 2d 1007 La. 1997
Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., , (1945).
Bordelon v. SOUTH CENT. BELL TELEPHONE CO. 617 So. 2d 1337 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Levi v. SW La. Elec. Membership Co-Op. 542 So. 2d 1081 La. 1989
Harper, James and Gray, supra, § 16.9; , (1945) (backing truck in dangerous place); Irelan-Yuba Gold Quartz Min.
Toten v. General Motors Corp. 479 So. 2d 957 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
Smith v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co., Inc. 467 So. 2d 70 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1985
The City argues that a motorist is required to see an obstruction that is readily visible, and his failure to do so constitutes lack of due care on his part, , (1945).
Williams v. Cortney Co. 459 So. 2d 681 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
Wiggins v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Co. 441 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
Lindstrom v. Arnold 421 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1982
Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. CHAMPION CHEM., INC. 420 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
Wallace v. Pan American Fire & Cas. Co. 352 So. 2d 1048 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
(1945); Pagitt Well Service, Inc. v. Sam Broussard, Inc., (La.App.
McCormick v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Company 328 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
(1945); Pagitt Well Service, Inc. v. Sam Broussard, Inc., (La.App.
Reggio v. Louisiana Gas Service Co. 333 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
(1945); Pagitt Well Service, Inc. v. Sam Broussard, Inc., (La.App.
Pagitt Well Service, Inc. v. Sam Broussard, Inc. 293 So. 2d 631 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
Campbell v. American Home Assurance Co. 241 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
(1945); Demerest v. Travelers Insurance Company, 234 La.
Dugas v. Achord 238 So. 2d 761 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
536, 538 (quoted with approval in Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., , ), as follows: ‘ * * * A motorist has not the right to assume that his course of travel is free of danger or obstruction, in the absence of his ability to see clearly ahead.
Dove v. Messina 230 So. 2d 615 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., , ; Demerest v. Travelers Insurance Co., 234 La.
Crockett v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. 229 So. 2d 169 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., , ; Demerest v. Travelers Insurance Co., 234 La.
Metrailer v. F & G MERCHANDISING, INC. 230 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., , .
Ardoin v. Travelers Ins. Co. 229 So. 2d 426 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
(1945); Demerest v. Travelers Insurance Company, 234 La.
Craig v. Burch 228 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., , ; Barret et al. v. Caddo Transfer & Warehouse Co., Inc., 165 La.
Crain v. W. R. Core Construction Co. 215 So. 2d 670 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., , ; Demerest v. Travelers Insurance Co., 234 La.
Gendusa v. Rabel 212 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
524 , ; , ; Lilly v. Schmitt, La.App., ; Valenti v. Allstate Insurance Company, La.App., .
Arnold v. Traders & General Insurance 204 So. 2d 425 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., , ; Demerest v. Travelers Insurance Co., 234 La.
Sittig v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 198 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
(1945); Demerest v. Travelers Ins.
Lilly v. Schmitt 198 So. 2d 502 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
524 , ; , ; Valenti v. Allstate Insurance Company, La.App., .
Brown v. New York Fire & Marine Underwriters, Inc. 198 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
(1945); Demerest v. Travelers Ins.
Hernandez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 192 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1967
Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., , 24 So.
Christ v. State, Department of Highways 161 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
405 , ; , ; Jackson v. Cook, 189 La.
Valenti v. Allstate Insurance 156 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
If he does so assume and continues to travel as though he knew there was perfect clearance ahead, he does so at his own risk and peril.” , ; Weadock v. Eagle Indemnity Company, La.App.1943, ; National Retailers Mutual Insurance Company v. Harkness, La.App.
Wright v. Home Indemnity Co. 153 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
The principle that the greater the danger the greater the degree of care required is now firmly imbedded in our jurisprudence; Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., , ; Hogue v. Akin Truck Line et al., (La.App.
Emmco Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 138 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
their second contention appellants rely on the following cases: Equitable Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Allstate Insurance Co., supra; Lambert v. Rogers, La.App., ; Cappo v. Baker, La.App., ; Wyman v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., La.App., ; Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co., of Hartford, Conn., La.App., ; , .
Lewis v. Quebedeaux 134 So. 2d 93 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
McCandless v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co. 120 So. 2d 501 La. 1960
Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., 1945, , ; Lopreore v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App.1946, .
Stephens v. Natchitoches Parish School Board 110 So. 2d 156 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
App., ; , ; Geoghegan v. Greyhound Corporation, 226 La.
Lambert v. Rogers 109 So. 2d 120 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
As we observed in Wilson v. Yellow Cab Co. [La.App., ], supra, , : "`The greater the danger the greater the necessity for caution.'
Demerest v. Travelers Insurance Company 102 So. 2d 451 La. 1958
536, 538 (quoted’ with approval in Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., , ), as follows: “ * * * A motorist has not the right to assume that his course .of travel is free of danger or obstruction, in the absence of his ability to see clearly ahead.
Pardue v. Norred 95 So. 2d 363 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc. 1945, , ; Lopreore v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc., La.App.
Watkins v. Strickland Transportation Co. 90 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Briefly stated, this simply means: “ ‘The greater the danger, the greater the necessity for caution’ National Retailers Mutual Insurance Company v. Harkness, 1954, La.App., -98; Wilson v. Yellow Cab Co. of Shreveport, Inc., 1953, La.App., ; Spencer v. Crain, 1951, La.App., ; Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., 1945, , ; Blashfield Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice, Section 1041, page 369, Volume 2; 5 American Jurisprudence 652, Section 269.
Dennis v. Iowa Mutual Insurance 79 So. 2d 395 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
556 ; Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., 1945, , .
Hickerson v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance 77 So. 2d 124 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
.” See also Phillips v. Central Surety & Ins.
Geoghegan v. Greyhound Corporation 76 So. 2d 412 La. 1954
Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., , .
National Retailers Mutual Insurance Co. v. Harkness 76 So. 2d 95 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
The rule has been briefly paraphrased in the words "the greater the danger the greater the necessity for caution"; Wilson v. Yellow Cab Company, La.App., ; Spencer v. Crain, La.App., ; , ; Blashfield Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice, Section 1041, page 369, Volume 2; 5 American Jurisprudence 652, Section 269.
Vowell v. Manufacturers Cas. Ins. Co. 73 So. 2d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
1942, ; Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, 1945, , ; Rachal v. Balthazar, La.App.
Harris v. Travelers Indemnity Co. of Hartford, Conn. 70 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
As we observed in Wilson v. Yellow Cab Co., supra, , : "The greater the danger the greater the necessity for caution."
Wilson v. Yellow Cab Co. of Shreveport 64 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
Bernard v. W. B. Delafield Trucking Lines 58 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
Plaintiff has cited the case of Culpepper v. Leonard Truck Lines, Inc., , , wherein a truck struck a fire escape located on the rear of the Arlington Hotel in Shreveport.
New Orleans Terminal Co. v. Herrin Transp. Co. 42 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1949
However, counsel for plaintiff rely primarily on what they contend is a "pertinent and favorable decision" , .