DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hemphill v. Tremont Lumber Co., 25 So. 2d 625.

54 citing documents.

  • Canady v. Pynes Chrysler, Inc. 617 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    (1946); McDonald v. Intern.
  • Spinks v. DEPT. OF HEALTH & HUMAN RES. 591 So. 2d 423 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1991
    (1946); McDonald v. Intern.
  • Tucker v. Pony Exp. Courier Corp. 562 So. 2d 897 La. 1990
    (1946); McDonald v. Intern.
  • Carruthers v. PPG Industries, Inc. 551 So. 2d 1282 La. 1989
    See, e.g., Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., , (1946).
  • Carruthers v. PPG Industries, Inc. 543 So. 2d 472 La. 1989
    See, e.g., Guidry v. Sline Industrial Painters, Inc., , (1946).
  • Riche v. City of Baton Rouge 541 So. 2d 905 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
    "Since there is no evidence in the record as to the value of the time employed by the experts who testified in this case, we think this matter should be referred to the lower court for determination", , , at page 629.
  • Pennington v. Reading & Bates Construction Co. 432 So. 2d 1173 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
  • Guidry v. Sline Indus. Painters, Inc. 418 So. 2d 626 La. 1982
  • Bracey v. Alexandria Transfer & Storage Co. 340 So. 2d 709 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    828 , (1959) , (1946); and, (2) in the alternative, that as a result of the October 1974 ankle injury he was forced to shift his weight to his left leg which put more stress on that extremity which in turn caused an acceleration of the disabling condition.
  • Geist v. Martin Decker Corp. 313 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    (1946); Lampkin v. Kent Piling Co., Inc.
  • Henderson v. Core Construction Company 295 So. 2d 874 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    Dortch *876 v. Louisiana Central Lumber Company, La.App., ; Jackson v. Travelers' Ins.
  • Fife v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. 263 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    (1946); Seals v. Potlatch Forests, Inc., supra; (La.App.
  • Brown v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corporation 250 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
    (1946); Seals v. Potlatch Forest, Inc. [La.App., 151 So.
  • Norred v. Travelers Insurance Company 236 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
    Malone's "Louisiana Workmen's Compensation," p. 278, § 232; , (1946); Behan v. John B. Honor Company, 143 La.
  • Hull v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 236 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    and cases therein cited.
  • Frame v. Majors 226 So. 2d 772 La. 1969
    Co., , ; and Bertrand v. Coal Operators Casualty Co., 253 La.
  • Bertrand v. Coal Operators Casualty Company 221 So. 2d 816 La. 1969
  • Vicknair v. Avondale Shipyards, Inc. 220 So. 2d 580 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
    App., (1961); Talbot v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, La.App., (1958); , (1946); Dusang v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., (1967); Landry v. Park Wood Products, Inc., La.App., (1967); Prater v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, La.App., (1966); Turner v. Howard Motors, Inc., La.App., (1966).
  • Bertrand v. Coal Operators Casualty Co. 204 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
  • Landry v. Park Wood Products, Inc. 201 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Nickelberry v. Ritchie Grocer Co., supra; , (1946); Prater v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, supra; (La.App.4th Cir. 1963, reversed in part on other grounds, 246 La.
  • Satterwhite v. Zurich Insurance Company 199 So. 2d 429 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    * * * * * * , 25 So.2nd 625, as follows: `In view of the language used and the conclusions reached in the case of Hemphill v. Tremont Lumber Co., 209 La.
  • Dusang v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 195 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
  • Prater v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 182 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    (1946); Seals v. Potlatch Forest, Inc., supra; (La.App.
  • Duhon v. Pittsburg Plate Glass Co. 179 So. 2d 469 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    828 , ; , ; Talbot v. Trinity Universal Ins.
  • Pierre v. Sledge Townsend Feed & Seed Store 165 So. 2d 513 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    589, 590 , L.R.A.1918F, 862 (1918), Guillory v. Reimers-Schneider, La.App., (1st Cir.1957), Rainwater v. Timothy, La.App., (or 11956), Washington v. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, La.App., (Or.1956) , (1940).
  • Price v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 155 So. 2d 213 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    this principle has been applied to many heart attack cases.
  • Saltalamacchia v. Strachan Shipping Corp. 156 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    Franklin v. Old Colony Insurance Company, La.App., ; Andrepont v. Calcasieu Paper Company, La.App., ; Talbot v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company, La.App., ; Hemphill v. Tre *296 mont Lumber Co., , .
  • Danziger v. Employers Mut. Liability Ins. Co. of Wis. 156 So. 2d 468 La. 1963
    330 ; , ; Fontenot v. Camden Fire Insurance Association, La.App., and other cases.
  • Franklin v. Old Colony Insurance Company 150 So. 2d 892 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1963
    Andrepont v. Calcasieu Paper Company, La.App., ; Talbot v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co., La.App., ; , .
  • Seals v. Potlatch Forests, Inc. 151 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    Later cases, , make it clear that the requirements of a compensable accident are met where excessive heat or strenuous effort cause, contribute to or accelerate the occurrence of a heart attack, even though the excessive heat or strenuous effort were nothing more than the usual and customary condition
  • Howard v. Globe Indemnity Co. 147 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    330 ; , ; Waller v. Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation, La.App., , and Malone, Louisiana Workmen’s Compensation Law and Practice, p. 261, which is quoted as follows: “In some of the cases it is stated that although the disabling event need not be different in kind or intensity from th
  • Vidrine v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. 137 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    See *669 , and cases there cited.
  • Whitworth v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. 135 So. 2d 584 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
  • Thomas v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. 135 So. 2d 505 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    the opinion of Mr. Chief Justice Fournet, in considering the causal relationship between employment and death from a heart attack, observed that the testimony of the medical experts should be regarded as the determining influence, since the case did not involve an accident causing external injuri
  • Theriot v. Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. 131 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    Turner v. Southern Industries Company, La.App., ; Rivero v. Leaveau, La.App., .
  • Fontenot v. Camden Fire Insurance Association 124 So. 2d 640 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
    our Supreme Court found the workmen's compensation claimant had sustained his burden of proof and held, as follows: "Since this case does not involve an accident causing external injuries or producing objective symptoms, we must look to the testimony of the medical experts to determine whether th
  • Parish v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York 124 So. 2d 234 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    Behan v. John B. Honor Co., 143 La.
  • Circello v. Haas & Haynie Corp. 116 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    828 , ; , ; Talbot v. Trinity Universal Ins.
  • McKnight v. Clemons 114 So. 2d 114 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    We believe that in so doing, our learned brother overlooked the well-settled jurisprudence summarized by Chief Justice Fournet for the Supreme Court, with many citations, , , at page 627: "* * * the legal requirements are present to constitute an accident and an injury is compensable where excessive heat, heavy lifting or other strenuous efforts, although usual and customary, cause or contribute to a physical breakdown or accelarate its occurrence because of a pre-existing
  • Cutno v. Neeb Kearney & Company 112 So. 2d 628 La. 1959
  • Brian v. Employers Casualty Co. 111 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    However, , , the employee was shown to have died about 30 minutes after he carried two 95-pound rolls of roofing material up a 12 or 13 foot ladder on a warm day in April.
  • Town of Slaughter v. Appleby 103 So. 2d 461 La. 1958
    and Mamon v. Farnsworth & Chambers Construction Co., Inc., La.App., .
  • Talbot v. Trinity Universal Insurance Company 99 So. 2d 811 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    * * *" , ; Craft v. Gulf Lumber Co., 151 La.
  • Hall v. Pipe Line Service Corporation 98 So. 2d 202 La. 1957
    the fees were allowed from the compensation award.
  • Guillory v. Reimers-Schneider Company 94 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    The employee's disability is fully compensable when precipitated by the industrial accident, even though caused also by a contributing pre-existing or previously dormant physical condition or predisposition, , ; Behan v. John B. Honor Co., 143 La.
  • France v. City of New Orleans 92 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    Turner v. Southern Industries Company, La.App., ; Michel v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.
  • Turner v. Southern Industries Company 88 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    The jurisprudence is "well settled" that "an injury is compensable where excessive heat, heavy lifting or other strenuous efforts, although usual and customary, cause or contribute to a physical breakdown or accelerate its occurrence because of a pre-existing condition" (many citations), , , at page 627.
  • Clifton v. Arnold 87 So. 2d 386 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    [1] Defendant further overlooks the well-established jurisprudence that "an injury is compensable where excessive heat, heavy lifting or other strenuous efforts, although usual and customary, cause or contribute to a physical breakdown or accelerate its occurrence because of a pre-existing condition", , , at page 627, allowing recovery to dependents of an employee dying as a result of a heart attack.
  • Mamon v. Farnsworth & Chambers Construction Co. 86 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    "Since there is no evidence in the record as to the value of the time employed by the experts who testified in this case, we think this matter should be referred to the lower court for determination", , , at page 629.
  • Hastings v. Homewood Development Co. 84 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Co., , ; sawing wood, Brister v. Miller, La.App., 178.