Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Glover v. Mayer, 25 So. 2d 242.

18 citing documents.

Spott v. Otis Elevator Co. 601 So. 2d 1355 La. 1992
1st Cir. 1983); , (1946) (the petition did not set forth facts sufficient to establish the existence of a partnership; therefore, plaintiff held not to have brought himself squarely within the venue exception for partnerships); Fourth Jefferson Drainage Dist.
Taylor v. Shreveport Airport Authority 564 So. 2d 744 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
(1946); Fourth Jefferson Drainage District v. City of New Orleans, 203 La.
Edmond v. Webre 413 So. 2d 306 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
(1946); Fourth Jefferson Drainage Dist.
Hawthorne Oil & Gas Corp. v. Continental Oil Co. 377 So. 2d 285 La. 1979
(1946); Fourth Jefferson Drainage Dist.
Duhon v. Lafayette General Hospital 286 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Clement v. Redi-Bilt Corporation 249 So. 2d 607 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1971
Tripani v. Meraux, 184 La.
Recile v. Weigel 188 So. 2d 636 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1966
Penn v. Burk 152 So. 2d 16 La. 1963
744 ; , ; Stovall v. Solomon, La.App., .
Anglade v. Hemenway Furniture Co. 151 So. 2d 164 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Tripani v. Meraux, 184 La.
Pennington v. Simmons 138 So. 2d 189 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
(1946), and Walker v. Delahoussaye, La.App., (1959).
Walker v. Delahoussaye 116 So. 2d 884 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Labat v. Labat 95 So. 2d 129 La. 1957
The mere fact *635 that two persons may both be interested pecuniarily in the same business 'venture, and that each gave to it equally his time and attention, by no manner of means carries with it as a matter of law, the conclusion that they stand towards each other as partners.” , , this court quoted with approval from the Chaffraix and Collom cases and then stated: “From the quoted observations it is clear that for persons to be considered as partners inter sese there must exist an intention t
Stovall v. Solomon 94 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
The decisions above cited have been approved recently in: Reel v. Brewer, La.App.1942, ; Glover v. Mayer, 1946, , ; Whitmeyer v. Poche, La.App.1950, ; Carlson v. Ewing, 1951, 219 La.
Harper v. Ragus 62 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1952
The decisions above cited have been approved recently in: Reel v. Brewer, La.App.1942, ; Glover v. Mayer, 1946, , ; Whitmeyer v. Poche, La.App.1950, ; Carlson v. Ewing, 1951, 219 La.
Carlson v. Ewing 54 So. 2d 414 La. 1951
quoting the earlier decisions of Chaffraix & Agar v. Lafitte & Co., 30 La.
Whitmeyer v. Poche 49 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1950
Ingersoll Corporation v. Rogers 46 So. 2d 45 La. 1950
cited by plaintiff’s counsel, is inappropriate.
Neal v. Ellington 36 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1948