DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Baker v. Baker, 26 So. 2d 132.

17 citing documents.

  • Bank of West Baton Rouge v. Hunerjager 633 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
  • Darnall v. John K. Darnall, Inc. 526 So. 2d 1317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
  • Bordelon v. Bordelon 499 So. 2d 1050 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    (1946), the Supreme Court stated: "In the case here under consideration, Florence Ella Baker was not a third party relying on the faith of the public records, since she did not acquire the property by purchase or any other similar way, and any rights that she might have had therein must necessarily flow
  • Mitchell v. Clark 448 So. 2d 681 La. 1984
    (1946); LeBleu v. Savoie, 109 La.
  • Mitchell v. Clark 431 So. 2d 817 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    729 (1903); Baker v. Baker, [ ] 26 S.(2d) 132 (La.1946); see Cernich v. Cernich, [ 210 La.
  • Doherty v. Baldwin 405 So. 2d 1301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    4th Cir. 1973); , (1946).
  • Calvary Tabernacle v. Louisiana Central Bank 384 So. 2d 814 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
  • BECKER & ASSOCIATES., INC. v. Lou-Ark Equip. Rent. Co., Inc. 331 So. 2d 474 La. 1976
  • City Bank & Trust Co. v. Caneco Const., Inc. 341 So. 2d 1331 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    (1946) the court held that parol evidence was admissible to show that what purported to be a cash sale was intended by both parties to the act as a pignorative contract or security device.
  • Succession of Hollier 158 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    where, in discussing the Kittredge case, the court said: "In so holding, this court made it clear that Kittredge, during his marriage, did not buy the corporation stock or acquire it in any similar way; in other words, that there was no acquisition under Article 2402 of the Revised Civil Code.
  • Willis v. Gordon 143 So. 2d 798 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    Article 2239, LSA-Civil Code, (citing cases.)” , ; Hearn v. Cockerham, La.App., 66 So.2d.
  • Gross v. Brooks 130 So. 2d 674 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    In support of that argument, counsel for defendant relies upon the provisions of Articles 1820-1833 and Articles 1841-1846 , ; Theriot v. Chaudoir, 17 La.
  • Williams v. Robinson 98 So. 2d 844 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
    which case involved an identical contention that the grantor never intended to execute a deed and believed that he was merely giving a mortgage or security for indebtedness.
  • Krokroskia v. Martin 61 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1952
  • Overby v. Beach 55 So. 2d 873 La. 1951
    810 , *881 , , and Sylvester v. Town of Ville Platte, 218 La.
  • Ball v. Campbell 55 So. 2d 250 La. 1951
  • Sylvester v. Town of Ville Platte 49 So. 2d 746 La. 1950
    and authorities, there cited.