Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Ferrand, 27 So. 2d 174.
-
State v. Johnson
670 So. 2d 651
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
Also, , (1946); (La.App.
-
State v. Dixon
628 So. 2d 1295
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1993
Also, , (1946); (La.App.
-
State v. Baker
535 So. 2d 861
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1988
(1946), on rehearing; State v. Mischiro, 165 La.
-
State v. Trigueros
485 So. 2d 568
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
(1946), on rehearing; State v. Mischiro, 165 La.
-
State v. Acliese
403 So. 2d 665
La. 1981
(1946), on rehearing; State v. Mischiro, 165 La.
-
State v. Morgan
296 So. 2d 286
La. 1974
(1946), on rehearing; State v. Mischiro, 165 La.
-
State v. Moore
278 So. 2d 781
La. 1973
961 , (1969); , (1946); State v. Cupit, 189 La.
-
State v. Frezal
278 So. 2d 64
La. 1973
(1946) and the dissent of Justice Barham in State v. Crook, 253 La.
-
State v. Edgecombe
275 So. 2d 740
La. 1973
* * * "In allowing the testimony of the said witnesses before the jury the Court based its decision on State v. Ferrand, 1946, , , 167 A.L.R.
- State v. Smart 170 So. 2d 365 La. 1964
- State v. Reinhardt 86 So. 2d 530 La. 1956
- State v. Michel 74 So. 2d 207 La. 1954
- State v. Michel 74 So. 2d 207 La. 1954
- State v. Wideman 51 So. 2d 96 La. 1951
- State v. Wood 40 So. 2d 797 La. 1949
-
State v. Brown
36 So. 2d 624
La. 1948
311; 7 Louisiana Law Review 127 and 311; and 21 Tulane Law Review 281) but are violative of the clear and unambiguous language of Articles 27 and 29 of the Louisiana Criminal Code and contrary to the holdings of this court with respect to other crimes than murder ( , , 167 A.L.R.
-
State v. Fletcher
27 So. 2d 179
La. 1946
While a 'rehearing has been granted in the case of State v. Ferrand, La.Sup., , wherein it Was held that evidence of the commission of prior acts of intercourse could not be admitted under the general rule excluding evidence of the commission of other offenses since the element of guilty knowledge, intent, and motive were not at issue in that case (the reasons for excepting these showings from