Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Mattio, 31 So. 2d 801.

38 citing documents.

State v. Hill 610 So. 2d 1080 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
(1947), the State's witness (a police superintendent), while under cross-examination, was questioned about a written statement given by the accused.
State v. Ferdinand 465 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
State v. Roche 341 So. 2d 348 La. 1976
State v. Nero, La., (1975); State v. Lane, La., (1974); , (1947).
Distinguished State v. Foy 278 So. 2d 38 La. 1973
State v. Anderson 229 So. 2d 329 La. 1969
495 , (statement of prosecuting witness); , 31 So.
State v. Brumfield 229 So. 2d 76 La. 1969
State v. Crook 221 So. 2d 473 La. 1969
495 , (statement of prosecuting witness) ; , (police report) .
State v. Hall 218 So. 2d 320 La. 1969
495 , (statement of prosecuting witness); , (police report).
State v. Manuel 217 So. 2d 369 La. 1968
State v. Dean 209 So. 2d 16 La. 1968
State v. Cardinale 206 So. 2d 510 La. 1968
782 , ; , ; State v. Simpson, supra [ 216 La.
State v. Cardinale 206 So. 2d 510 La. 1968
782 , ; , ; State v. Simpson, supra [ 216 La.
State v. Fruge 204 So. 2d 287 La. 1967
2d 230 ; , , certiorari denied 332 U.S. 818 , 68 S.Ct.
State v. Hunter 195 So. 2d 273 La. 1967
495 , (statement of prosecuting witness); , (police report).
State v. Beard 191 So. 2d 631 La. 1966
State v. McLean, 216 La.
State v. Simien 178 So. 2d 266 La. 1965
State v. Simpson, 216 La.
State v. Pailet 165 So. 2d 294 La. 1964
(police report) ; State v. Vallery, 214 La.
City of Monroe v. Dozier 164 So. 2d 322 La. 1964
669 , ; , ; State v. Williams, 213 La.
State v. Vines 162 So. 2d 332 La. 1964
669 , ; , ; State v. Williams, 213 La.
State v. McIlvaine 160 So. 2d 566 La. 1964
695 , ; , ; State v. Vallery, 214 La.
State v. McIlvaine 160 So. 2d 566 La. 1964
695 , ; , ; State v. Vallery, 214 La.
Hewitt v. Webster 118 So. 2d 688 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
The court likewise, , , expressed considerable doubt that a police report was a public record within the contemplation of the public Records Act.
State v. Domino 102 So. 2d 227 La. 1958
State v. Weston 95 So. 2d 305 La. 1957
State v. Simpson, 216 La.
State v. Kennedy 95 So. 2d 301 La. 1957
954 , ; , ; State v. Matassa, supra.
State v. Sheffield 93 So. 2d 691 La. 1957
841 , 5 So.Zd 125; , ; State v. Rocco, 222 La.
State v. Di Vincenti 93 So. 2d 676 La. 1957
1048 , ; , ; State v. Vallery, 214 La.
State v. Reinhardt 86 So. 2d 530 La. 1956
559 , , .” The following syllabus from the case of State v. Wales, 168 La.
State v. Labat 75 So. 2d 333 La. 1954
State v. Simpson, 216 La.
State v. Michel 74 So. 2d 207 La. 1954
State v. Michel 74 So. 2d 207 La. 1954
State v. Paternostro 68 So. 2d 767 La. 1953
State v. McLean, 216 La.
State v. Haddad 59 So. 2d 411 La. 1952
782 , ; , ; State v. Simpson, supra.
State v. Sears 55 So. 2d 881 La. 1951
486 , ) and its failure to do so does not create an adverse legal inference or place it in the position of vouching for their truth.
State v. Sears 55 So. 2d 881 La. 1951
486 , ) and its failure to do so does not create an adverse legal inference or place it in the position of vouching for their truth.
State v. Wideman 51 So. 2d 96 La. 1951
State v. Simpson 43 So. 2d 585 La. 1949
the court again specifically stated that the rule of the Dorsey Case applied only to the written statements of the accused himself.
State v. Vallery 38 So. 2d 148 La. 1948

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by