Manuel v. Ortego
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., February 2, 1970 231 So. 2d 584; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., March 22, 1954 71 So. 2d 657; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., July 5, 1930 129 So. 429; La., May 15, 1872 24 La. Ann. 435
Manuel v. Ortego, 261 So. 2d 82 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972).
Opinion text
HOOD, Judge. This is a workmen’s compensation suit instituted by Adam Manuel against Mr. and Mrs. Joseph E. Ortego. The trial court rendered judgment in favor of the defendants, and plaintiff has appealed. The trial judge found that “plaintiff has failed to prove that he suffered an accident while working for Joseph E. Ortego,” and he rendered judgment rejecting plaintiff’s demands. We have examined the record and have concluded that there is no error in the findings of or in the judgment rendered by the trial court. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. The costs of this appeal are assessed to plaintiff-appellant. Affirmed.