Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Weber v. H. G. Hill Stores, Inc., 29 So. 2d 33.

13 citing documents.

  • Peironnet v. Matador Resources Co. 103 So. 3d 445 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2012
    Hill Stores, Inc., , (1946), make an inaccurate assessment of the partial rescission occurring within certain reformation actions such as the present.
  • Kizer v. Lilly 471 So. 2d 716 La. 1985
    Hill Stores Co., , (1946).
  • Karmgard v. SOUTHLAND MORTG. & TITLE CO. 341 So. 2d 1109 La. 1977
    Weber v. H. G. Hill Stores, Inc., , (1946); Rougeau v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., La.App., (1972); Humble Oil and Refining Co. v. Chappuis, La.App., (1970).
  • Starns v. Ducote 254 So. 2d 301 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    1st Cir., 1967); Weber v. H. G. Hill *303 Stores, Inc., , (1946); (La.App.
  • O'NIELL v. Sonnier 195 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Weber v. H. G. Hill Stores, Inc., , (1946).
  • Evangeline Refining Co. v. Nunez 153 So. 2d 886 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    688 ; So.2d 33 ; Gross v. Brooks, La.App., ; L.S.A.-C.C.
  • Keen v. Lirocchi 153 So. 2d 134 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
  • Carter Oil Company v. King 134 So. 2d 89 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    215 , ; Weber v. H. G. Hill Stores, Inc., 1946, , ; and Southwest Gas Producing Company, Inc., et al. v. Hattie Brothers et al., 1956, 230 La.
  • Great Sweet Grass Oils Co. v. Kroy-American Oils, Inc. 129 So. 2d 591 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    Weber v. H. G. Hill Stores Co., 1946, So.2d 33 .
  • Hall v. Hall 127 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    Weber v. H. G. Hill Stores, Inc., , ; Sladovich v. Glaser, 150 La.
  • Zemurray v. Boe 105 So. 2d 243 La. 1958
    Weber v. H. G. Hill Stores, Inc., So.2d 33 ; Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana v. Futral, 204 La.
  • Oliver v. Shreveport Municipal Fire & Police Civil Service Board 88 So. 2d 405 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Crescent Cigar & Tobacco Co. v. Mire, supra; Thompson v. General Accident Fire & Life Assur.
  • Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc. 55 So. 2d 239 La. 1951
    In the comparatively recent case of Weber v. H. G. Hill Stores, Inc., , , when overruling an exception of no cause of action, we observed: “These allegations are, in our opinion, sufficient to constitute a cause of action, However, after considering the entire petition, even if in our minds there should exist any final doubt as to whether the exception should be sustaine