Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Spring v. Spring, 27 So. 2d 358.
-
Ross v. Schultz
542 So. 2d 125
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1989
(1946); Walcup v. Honish, 210 La.
-
Trotter v. Trotter
503 So. 2d 1160
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
art. 46; , (1946); Walcup v. Honish, 210 La.
- Howard v. Howard 499 So. 2d 222 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1986
-
Gowins v. Gowins
466 So. 2d 32
La. 1985
art. 46; , (1946); Walcup v. Honish, 210 La.
- Moreau v. Moreau 457 So. 2d 1285 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
-
Biri v. Biri
192 So. 2d 862
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Walcup v. Honish, 210 La.
-
King v. King
173 So. 2d 882
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
[3] , ; Walcup v. Honish, 210 La.
-
Shockey v. Shockey
149 So. 2d 111
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Walcup v. Honish, 210 La.
- Fresolone v. O'Beirne 146 So. 2d 41 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
-
Nugent v. Nugent
126 So. 2d 387
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
839 ; Spring v. Spring, 1946, , ; Walcup v. Honish, 1946, 210 La.
-
Davidson v. Helm
63 So. 2d 866
La. 1953
839 ; Spring v. Spring, 1946, , ; Walcup v. Honish, 1946, 210 La.
-
Walsh v. Walsh
42 So. 2d 860
La. 1949
478 , ; , and Walcup v. Honish, 210 La.
-
Walcup v. Honish
28 So. 2d 452
La. 1946
358 , , decided June 14, 1946, this court stated: “ * * * The only reasonable interpretation of the Act, insofar as it authorizes either party to a marriage contract to sue in the courts of his or her residence, is that it undoubtedly contemplates a bona fide residence or domicile.” At the time plaintiff enlisted in th