DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Betz v. Riviere, 29 So. 2d 465.

41 citing documents.

  • Washington v. Guillotte 268 So. 3d 1048 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 2nd Cir. 1979) (wherein the Second Circuit Court of Appeal held that income tax returns are not conclusive evidence for purposes of fixing damages for loss of wages); see also Betz v. Riviere , , , 472 (1947).
  • Succession of Brewster 663 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
    Curtis, supra, at 59 , citing Graves, supra, , (1947).
  • Landwehr v. Landwehr 547 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1989
    Graves v. United States Rubber Co., (supra), , (1947).
  • Cooper v. Heirs of Cooper 421 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
    509 , (1956); , (1947); Houghton v. Hall, supra; and Luchsinger v. Boettner, supra.
  • Curtis v. Curtis 403 So. 2d 56 La. 1981
    429 , (1962); , (1947); Montgomery v. Bonanchaud, 179 La.
  • Corpus Christi Parish Credit Union v. Martin 358 So. 2d 295 La. 1978
    465 , (1947); American Surety Co. v. Nobel & Salter, 196 La.
  • Metairie Bank & Trust Co. v. WENDRYHOSKI, ETC. 338 So. 2d 978 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
    The wife argued, first, that she has the traditional right of the wife to show that property acquired during marriage (in her name, in the cases we have found) is her separate property rather than community, see, e.g., Betz v. Riviere, 1947, , ; and second, the unnecessity of preferring a judicial mortgagee over the unrecorded claim of a wife, since—as the fisherman cannot rely on the fish when he casts his net—one does not obtain and record a judgment in reliance on the public records (citing t
  • Guilott v. Guilott 326 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    Graves v. United States Rubber Company, 237 La.
  • Moore v. Kinney 315 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    (1947); Grosz v. Nolan, 170 La.
  • Mertens v. Mertens 308 So. 2d 506 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    (1947); Grosz v. Nolan, 170 La.
  • Mertens v. Mertens 308 So. 2d 508 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    (1947); *511 Grosz v. Nolan, 170 La.
  • Primeaux v. Libersat 307 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    (1947) and Comeaux v. Noel, 251 So.
  • Stevens v. Claiborne Company 305 So. 2d 570 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    Betz v. Riviere, 1947, , .
  • Succession of Miangolarra 297 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    201 (1830), Betz v. Riviere, La.App., , Lotz v. Citizens Bank & Trust Co.
  • Wright v. Mark C. Smith & Sons Partnership 264 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    616 ; , ; Succession of Babin, 213 La.
  • McElwee v. McElwee 255 So. 2d 883 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
  • Comeaux v. Noel 251 So. 2d 94 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    (1947) and ruled that the wife was entitled to contest the facts recited in the authentic act and that she did prove that the parties intended the “Cash Deed” to be a donation rather than a cash sale.
  • Minden Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. Goodman 243 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    (1947), the court defined the burden on the party seeking to overcome the presumption laid down under these articles as follows: “Under our community system of law all property acquired by either spouse during the existence of the marriage is presumed to fall into the community of acquets and gains and
  • Paxton v. Bramlette 228 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
    Graves v. United States Rubber Company, 237 La.
  • Succession of Winsey 170 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    The presumption so created, however, can be overcome upon proper proof, the requirements of which were pronounced in Betz v. Riviere, 1947, , , wherein the Supreme Court set forth the following rules: “ ‘Under our community system of law all property acquired by either spouse during the existence of the marriage is presumed to fall into the community of acquets and gains and to overcome this presumption the wife claiming the property in
  • Vining v. Beatty 161 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    37 ; , ; Butler v. Burks et al, La.App.
  • Bradford v. Patterson 159 So. 2d 342 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    950 , ; , ; Cox v. First Nat.
  • Bailey v. Alice C. Plantation & Refinery Inc. 152 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    63 , (1947) and cases cited therein.
  • Monk v. Monk 144 So. 2d 384 La. 1962
    In the event the purchase is made on credit, she has the further burden of establishing (4) that she not only made the down payment out of her separate and paraphernal funds, but that she had sufficient separate revenues and funds to make the purchase with reasonable certainty of being able to meet the deferred payments.” , .
  • Succession of Viola 138 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    177 , ; , ; Crutchfield v. Moch, 148 La.
  • Southwest Natural Production Company v. Anderson 118 So. 2d 897 La. 1960
    972 , ; , ; Cameron v. Rowland, 215' La.
  • Graves v. United States Rubber Company 111 So. 2d 752 La. 1959
    27 Tulane Law Review 143, 175, 207.
  • Blasingame v. Anderson 108 So. 2d 105 La. 1959
    950 , ; , ; Corkern v. Travelers Insurance Co., 229 La.
  • Joseph v. Travis 99 So. 2d 548 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    The presumption so created, however, can be overcome upon proper proof, the requirements of which were pronounced in Betz v. Riviere, 1947, , , wherein the Supreme Court set forth the following rules: “ ‘Under our community system of law all property acquired by either spouse during the existence of the marriage is presumed to fall into the community of acquets and gains and to overcome this presumption the wife claiming the property in
  • Butler v. Burks 99 So. 2d 180 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
    The presumption so created, however, can be overcome upon proper proof, the requirements of which were pronounced in Betz v. Riviere, 1947, , , wherein the Supreme Court set forth the following rules.
  • Weems v. Medak 93 So. 2d 217 La. 1957
    37 ; , ; Succession of Land, 212 La.
  • Smith v. Smith 89 So. 2d 55 La. 1956
    972 , ; , ; Cameron v. Rowland, 215 La.
  • Prince v. Hopson 89 So. 2d 128 La. 1956
    972 , ; , ; Cameron v. Rowland, 215 La.
  • Corkern v. Travelers Insurance Co. 86 So. 2d 205 La. 1956
  • Thomas v. Winsey 76 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    812 , ; , ; Block v. Melville, 22 La.Ann.
  • Guilbeau v. Guilbeau 71 So. 2d 129 La. 1954
    makes the following statement: “Under our community system of law all property acquired by either spouse during the existence of the marriage is presumed to fall into the community of acquets and gains and to overcome this presumption the wife claiming the property in her own name to be her separ
  • Succession of Schnitter 56 So. 2d 563 La. 1951
    See also Houghton v. Hall et al., supra; , .
  • Succession of Schnitter 56 So. 2d 563 La. 1951
    See also Houghton v. Hall et al., supra; , .
  • Bardwell v. Parish Council of Parish 44 So. 2d 107 La. 1949
  • Hawthorne v. Hawthorne 39 So. 2d 338 La. 1949
  • Succession of Land 31 So. 2d 609 La. 1947
    Betz v. Riviere (Riviere v. Riviere), , .