DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Adams, 28 So. 2d 269.

14 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Alton Lane Strother La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    The defendant based his argument, in part, on the fact that “[h]e 10 could not be guilty of attempted criminal neglect because there is no such crime,” So.2d 269 (1946).
  • State v. Strother 19 So. 3d 598 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2009
    The defendant based his argument, in part, on the fact that "[h]e could not be guilty of attempted criminal neglect because there is no such crime," , (1946).
  • State v. Cortez 687 So. 2d 515 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1996
    The defendant based his argument, in part, on the fact that "[h]e could not be guilty of attempted criminal neglect because there is no such crime," , (1946).
  • State v. Fenner 664 So. 2d 1315 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1995
  • State v. Beason 653 So. 2d 1274 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1995
  • State v. Martin 539 So. 2d 1235 La. 1989
    In support of this contention, , (1946).
  • State v. Mayeux 498 So. 2d 701 La. 1986
    (1946) the defendant was prosecuted for attempted murder.
  • State v. Freeman 409 So. 2d 581 La. 1982
  • State v. Booker 385 So. 2d 1186 La. 1980
    Reporter's Comment, R.S.
  • City of New Orleans v. Hollis 329 So. 2d 681 La. 1976
  • State v. Fulghum 138 So. 2d 569 La. 1962
    murder in the element of provocation under the first definition of murder and manslaughter; and, under the second definition, the difference is 'in the nature of the several crimes being committed by the offender at the time a human being is killed.” Counsel for the defendant contended that requested Special Charge No. 14 , : “The difference between murder and manslaughter is not in the existence or absence of an intent to kill, but in the existence or absence of malice aforethought.” Counsel co
  • State v. Feltus 101 So. 2d 682 La. 1958
  • State v. Sears 55 So. 2d 881 La. 1951
    228 , , , are merely quotations of the common law distinction between murder and voluntary manslaughter and are not authority for the contention that malice is the essential difference between the crimes as defined by the Louisiana Criminal Code.
  • State v. Sears 55 So. 2d 881 La. 1951
    228 , , , are-merely quotations of the common law distinction between murder and voluntary-manslaughter and are not authority for the contention that malice is the essential difference between the crimes as defined by-the Louisiana Criminal Code.