Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hemel v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 29 So. 2d 483.

52 citing documents.

Mark Landry v. Louisiana Citizens Property Ins. Corp. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Co., So.2d 483 (1947); 6 Edwards v. Life & Cas.
Landry v. Louisiana Citizens Prop. Ins. Co. 964 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2007
Co., , (1947); Edwards v. Life & Cas.
Dubroc v. Allen Parish Police Jury 711 So. 2d 381 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1998
Hemmel[Hemel] v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, , (1947).
Jackson v. Rogers 665 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. 630 So. 2d 759 La. 1994
Co., , (1947) (quoting Williams v. Union Central Life Ins.
Perault v. Time Ins. Co. 633 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
Epps v. City of Baton Rouge 604 So. 2d 1336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Thibodeaux v. Doe 602 So. 2d 1076 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
Kellams v. Oliver 595 So. 2d 331 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Co., , (1947); Percy v. Safeguard Ins.
Quinlan v. Liberty Bank and Trust Co. 575 So. 2d 336 La. 1991
D'ANGELO v. Doe 535 So. 2d 31 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1988
Co., , (1947); Percy v. Safeguard Ins.
Doty v. Safeco Ins. Co. 400 So. 2d 718 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
Benton Casing Service, Inc. v. Avemco Ins. Co. 379 So. 2d 225 La. 1979
Agency Management Corp. v. Riviere 302 So. 2d 388 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Atlas Lubricant Corp. v. Federal Ins. Co. of NJ 293 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Co., , (1947); Edwards v. Life Casualty Ins.
Andrus v. Police Jury of Parish of Lafayette 270 So. 2d 280 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
Elledge v. Warren 263 So. 2d 912 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
Sherwood v. Stein 259 So. 2d 876 La. 1972
Co., , (1947); Muse v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
Sherwood v. Stein 244 So. 2d 647 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1971
Barrett v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 236 So. 2d 900 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
Co., , ; Edwards v. Life & Casualty Ins.
Hurst v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company 234 So. 2d 802 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
1st Cir. 1964), , , as follows: "`Effect must be given to every part of the agreement if it is possible and while it is the universal rule of construction that all ambiguities must be construed in favor of the insured and against the insurer, when the intent of the parties is evident from the terms of the contract there
Herring v. American Bankers Insurance Company 216 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
Co., , ; Edwards v. Life & Casualty Ins.
Scallion v. Borne 207 So. 2d 267 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
263, 278 , ; , ; Edwards v. Life & Casualty Ins.
Hebert v. North British and Mercantile Insurance Co. 204 So. 2d 655 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
Co., , (1947); Zurich Ins.
Borne v. Dillon 201 So. 2d 115 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Co., , ; Edwards v. Life & Casualty Ins.
Brady v. American Insurance Company 198 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Co., supra [ , ]; Parks v. Hall, 189 La.
Zurich Insurance Company v. Bouler 198 So. 2d 129 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
Sholes v. Continental Casualty Company 196 So. 2d 680 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
Rancatore v. Evans 182 So. 2d 102 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
Co., , ; Barnett v. City of Monroe, La.App., .
Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 178 So. 2d 238 La. 1965
Boudreaux v. Heymann 175 So. 2d 12 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Loubat v. Audubon Life Insurance Company 170 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
Co., , , stated: "Effect must be given to every part of the agreement if it is possible and while it is the universal rule of construction that all ambiguities must be construed in favor of the insured and against the insurer, when the intent of the parties is evident from the terms of the contract there is no
Harmon v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company 170 So. 2d 646 La. 1965
Harmon v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. 170 So. 2d 646 La. 1965
Lincombe v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 166 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
2 Cir., (Cert, denied); , ; Leteff v. Maryland Casualty Company, La.App.
Wischan v. Brockhaus 163 So. 2d 572 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Liprie v. Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Co. 143 So. 2d 597 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance v. Russell 135 So. 2d 491 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Anderson v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Ins. Co. 127 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Fullilove v. US Casualty Company of New York 125 So. 2d 389 La. 1960
1024 , ; , ; Oil Well Supply Co. v. New York Life Ins.
Barnett v. City of Monroe 124 So. 2d 249 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Co., , ; Muse v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
Sumrall v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 124 So. 2d 168 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
Co., , ; Edwards v. Life & Casualty Ins.
Monteleone v. AMERICAN EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE CO. 120 So. 2d 70 La. 1960
Co., ; and authorities there cited.
Jones v. Standard Life and Accident Insurance Co. 115 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1959
Co., , ; Stanley v. Cryer Drilling Co., 213 La.
Toler v. All American Assurance Co. of Louisiana 112 So. 2d 623 La. 1959
Co., , ; Stanley v. Cryer Drilling Co., 213 La.
King v. Mason 95 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
Co., , ; Stanley v. Cryer Drilling Co., 213 La.
Leteff v. Maryland Casualty Company 91 So. 2d 123 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
The Louisiana Supreme Court through Chief Justice Fournet, , , stated: "`An insurance policy is a contract and the rules established for the construction of written instruments apply to contracts of insurance.'
Anderson v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. 84 So. 2d 878 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
See also: Hemel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 1947, , ; Nyman v. Monteleone-Iberville Garage, Inc., 1947, 211 La.
Barnard v. Houston Fire & Casualty Insurance Co. 81 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1955
Co., , ; Stanley v. Cryer Drilling Co., 213 La.
McKinney v. American Security Life Insurance Co. 76 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1954
Co., 1947, , ; Stanley v. Cryer Drilling Company, 1948, 213 La.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by