DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Bessar, 34 So. 2d 785.

25 citing documents.

  • State v. Byrd 923 So. 2d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    State v. Odom, 02-2698 at p. 11, 861 So.2d at 195 ( , (1948)).
  • State v. George 908 So. 2d 79 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2005
  • State v. Odom 861 So. 2d 187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2003
  • State v. Gardner 844 So. 2d 1097 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2003
    [(1948)], State v. Masino et al., 214 La.
  • State v. Larsen 489 So. 2d 324 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    (1948); State v. Masino, 214 La.
  • State v. Anthony 427 So. 2d 1155 La. 1983
    *1159 , (1948), has previously addressed the argument of defendant that the underlying felony had been completed at the time of the homicide.
  • State v. Souby 332 So. 2d 253 La. 1976
    484-85; , 34 So.2d *256 785 (1948); State v. Masino, 214 La.
  • State v. Edwards 287 So. 2d 518 La. 1973
  • State v. Luquette 275 So. 2d 396 La. 1973
    683 , (1965); , (1948); State v. Ledet, 211 La.
  • State v. Heymann 235 So. 2d 78 La. 1970
  • State v. Bonfanti 227 So. 2d 916 La. 1969
  • State v. Mann 202 So. 2d 259 La. 1967
    State v. Masino et al., 214 La.
  • State v. Atkins 181 So. 2d 779 La. 1966
    State v. Masino et al., 214 La.
  • State v. Perkins 178 So. 2d 255 La. 1965
    609 , ; , ; State v. Masino, 214 La.
  • State v. Smart 170 So. 2d 365 La. 1964
    and State v. Masino, 214 La.
  • State v. Garner 115 So. 2d 855 La. 1959
    Cf., , ; State v. Picou, 236 La.
  • State v. Dugan 86 So. 2d 528 La. 1956
  • State v. Holmes 65 So. 2d 890 La. 1953
    In substance, , ; State v. Masino, 214 La.
  • State v. Winfield 62 So. 2d 258 La. 1952
    212 , ; , and State v. Cook, 215 La.
  • State v. Towns 62 So. 2d 634 La. 1952
    1016 ; , ; State v. Burns, 131 La.
  • State v. Bentley 54 So. 2d 137 La. 1951
    694 , ; , ; and State v. Davis, 214 La.
  • State v. Leming 46 So. 2d 262 La. 1950
    Cases so holding: State v. Bessar [ ], 34 So.2d page 785; State v. Chanet [ 209 La.
  • State v. Simpson 43 So. 2d 585 La. 1949
  • State v. Cook 39 So. 2d 898 La. 1949
  • State v. Masino 38 So. 2d 622 La. 1949
    789: “The indictment returned by the jury in this case being in the short form prescribed by the Code of Criminal Procedure, the defendant was entitled to a bill of particulars setting out more specifically and in detail the offense charged, i. e., the facts upon which the prosecution is based, A