Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lamar v. Young, 30 So. 2d 853.
-
Huger v. Morrison
809 So. 2d 1140
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2002
As to the first argument concerning conduct serving to waive contractual terms in lieu of a written waiver
-
Deleon v. WSIS, INC.
728 So. 2d 1046
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
(1947), an agreement to sell was not completed by the specified closing date because the buyer determined that a survey of the property was necessary.
-
Dapremont v. Crossley
367 So. 2d 127
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1979
[5] , (1947), in which the court found time was of the essence because it was necessary for tax purposes to complete the sale within the calendar year.
- Luna v. Atchafalaya Realty, Inc. 325 So. 2d 835 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
-
Fortenberry v. Decay
279 So. 2d 725
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
In so holding, , (1947); Harrell v. Stumberg, 220 La.
-
Ezell v. Loucks
167 So. 2d 452
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
Di Cristina v. Weiser, 215 La.
- Ragusa v. Li Rocchi 108 So. 2d 521 La. 1959
-
Everhardt v. Sighinolfi
95 So. 2d 632
La. 1957
758 , , and Harrell v. Stumberg, 220 La.
-
Everhardt v. Sighinolfi
95 So. 2d 632
La. 1957
758 , , and Harrell v. Stumberg, 220 La.
-
Shell Oil Co. v. Hogan
81 So. 2d 761
La. 1955
DiCristina v. Weiser, 215 La.
-
Harrell v. Stumberg
57 So. 2d 692
La. 1952
Di Cristina v. Weiser, 215 La.
-
Harrell v. Stumberg
57 So. 2d 692
La. 1952
Di Cristina v. Weiser, 215 La.
-
Di Cristina v. Weiser
42 So. 2d 868
La. 1949
another case cited by plaintiff, is in -line with our ruling here as, there, the demand was denied on the ground that plaintiff defaulted by failing to take title within the time specified, as time was of the essence of the contract.
-
Coci v. Johness
37 So. 2d 823
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1948
the Supreme Court considered such a situation.