DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Johnson, 39 So. 2d 340.

26 citing documents.

  • Jesse Blocker v. Kimberly Ferguson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2012
  • In re C.B. 643 So. 2d 1251 La. 1994
  • In Re CB, Applying for Adoption 643 So. 2d 1251 La. 1994
  • McCloud v. McCloud 544 So. 2d 764 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
  • Maxwell v. LeBlanc 434 So. 2d 375 La. 1983
    922 , (1949); , (1949); Pierce v. Pierce, 213 La.
  • Strong v. Trosclair 423 So. 2d 13 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Simoneaux v. Perez 418 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Johnson v. Johnson 357 So. 2d 69 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
  • McDonald v. McDonald 357 So. 2d 1293 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    (1949); Newson v. Newson, 176 La.
  • Pate v. Pate 348 So. 2d 1338 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    (1949); Newson v. Newson, *1340 176 La.
  • Sims v. Sims 340 So. 2d 397 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
  • Lawson v. Lawson 311 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
  • Lemoine v. Lemoine 303 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
    (1949), the following appears: "In this state the law is well settled that, when the parents of children are separated or divorced, and the care and custody of the children, issue of their marriage, are vested in one of the parents, the other possesses certain natural rights with respect to the children
  • Litton v. Litton 299 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
  • Cook v. Wingo 281 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    (1949), in which our Supreme Court succinctly stated: "visitation should never in any case be extended to the point where it becomes divided custody or a division of such authority."
  • Poole v. Poole 270 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Spencer v. Spencer 273 So. 2d 605 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
  • Woods v. Woods 253 So. 2d 230 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Franz v. Franz 230 So. 2d 450 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
    (1949), and cases cited therein; Holley v. Holley, La.App., (3rd Cir. 1963).
  • Bowlin v. Bowlin 222 So. 2d 637 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Ogden v. Ogden 220 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
  • Gallagher v. Gallagher 218 So. 2d 366 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    (1949), as follows: “With these rules in mind, we may safely conclude that under the jurisprudence of this state, where a parent has not forfeited his right of visitation by his conduct and where the exercise of this privilege would not injuriously affect the welfare of the child, a parent against whom
  • Gallagher v. Gallagher 212 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Vinet v. Vinet 184 So. 2d 33 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    Appellant argues that this portion of the judgment constitutes a , 39 So.
  • Holley v. Holley 158 So. 2d 620 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    and the cases cited therein.
  • Teague v. Teague 157 So. 2d 595 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    See: , (1949) and Sampognaro v. Sampognaro, 215 La.