Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Truby, 29 So. 2d 758.

62 citing documents.

City of Shreveport v. Brewer 72 So. 2d 308 La. 1954
the defendants were convicted of keeping a disorderly place which was defined by statute as the intentional maintaining of a place to be used habitually for any illegal or immoral purpose.
State v. Shourds 71 So. 2d 340 La. 1954
Compare, , ; State v. Vallery, 212 La.
State v. MacK 71 So. 2d 315 La. 1954
Louisiana Code of Criminal Law and Procedure, Articles 3 and 7; LSA-R.S.
State v. Penniman 68 So. 2d 770 La. 1953
wherein we refused to supply the definition of “immoral purposes,” omitted by the legislature in denouncing as a crime the keeping *100 of a disorderly place for immoral purposes; State v. Vallery, 212 La.
State v. Jones 56 So. 2d 724 La. 1951
697 , and cases therein cited; , ; State v. Duncan, 219 La.
State v. Jones 56 So. 2d 724 La. 1951
697 , and cases therein cited; , ; State v. Duncan, 219 La.
State v. Bowden 55 So. 2d 764 La. 1951
State v. Kraft 37 So. 2d 815 La. 1948
which was cited with approval in State v. Vallery, 212 La.
State v. Brown 36 So. 2d 624 La. 1948
State v. Saibold 34 So. 2d 909 La. 1948
is relied on as complete authority for his position.
State v. Vallery 34 So. 2d 329 La. 1948
ction 7 of Article 92 of the Criminal Code, contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile is defined to be “the intentional enticing, aiding, or permitting, by anyone over the age of seventeen, of any child under the age of seventeen to: * * * Perform any immoral act.” , , wherein all of the jurisprudence was carefully reviewed and analyzed, that the word “immoral” as used in Article 104 of the Criminal Code, denouncing the keeping of a disorderly place, has a meaning of such vagueness, indefini
State v. Le Blanc 34 So. 2d 905 La. 1948
954 , , , , it is proper and appropriate for us to consider the comments under the articles of the Code in our efforts to construe its provisions.