DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., 30 So. 2d 841.

27 citing documents.

  • New Orleans Fire Fighters Pension & Relief Fund v. City of New Orleans 242 So. 3d 682 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2018
    App. 4 Cir. 1955), quoting Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co ., , , 849 (La.
  • English Turn Property Owner's Ass'n v. Short 204 So. 3d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
    App. 4 Cir. 1984); see also, Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , (1947) ("..
  • Judson v. Davis 81 So. 3d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2011
    565, 573 , -50 (La.1943), and Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co.
  • West Cameron Port, Harbor and Terminal District v. Lake Charles Harbor & Terminal Dist. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    4 Cir. 1982), which quoted Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., for the proposition that, “the generally accepted rule [is] that the contemporaneous construction given a statute by those charged with its execution is entitled to great weight and should not be disregarded except for cogent reasons, [but] this rule is not controlling, particularly if such constru
  • West Cameron Port v. Lake Charles Harbor & Terminal Dist. 38 So. 3d 577 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2010
    4 Cir.1982), which quoted Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , (1947), for the proposition that, "the generally accepted rule [is] that the contemporaneous construction given a statute by those charged with its execution is entitled to great weight and should not be disregarded except for cogent reasons, [but] this rule is not controlling, particularly if such
  • Gill v. Johnson 617 So. 2d 26 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
    In Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , (1947) the court stated: “Another of the well settled rules of law of this state is that interest is never due on a judgment unless provision is made in the judgment for the payment of the interest excepting, of course, those judgments rendered in tort actions, which are specifically provided for b
  • Distinguished Salter v. STATE THROUGH DHHR 612 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , (1947).
  • Distinguished Salter v. State ex rel. Department of Health & Human Resources 612 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , (1947).
  • Mark Investments, Inc. v. Motwane's America, Inc. 483 So. 2d 1187 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    — Fortuitous event is that which happens by a cause which we can not resist.” In Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , (1947), the Louisiana Supreme Court contemplated the meaning of “fortuitous event" or “irresistible force” within the framework of LSA-C.C.
  • Williams v. Williams 431 So. 2d 780 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1983
    [706], ; Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , .
  • Clark v. BOARD OF COM'RS, ETC. 422 So. 2d 247 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    The rule prevailing in this State, it said, "has been enunciated in the relatively recent case of Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , (1947) wherein the court during the course of its opinion asserted: "`While it is the generally accepted rule that the contemporaneous construction given a statute by those charged with its execution is entitled to great weight and should not be disregarded except for cogent reasons, this rule is n
  • In re Liquidation of Delta Security Bank & Trust Co. 327 So. 2d 163 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
    The trial judge based his finding of waiver of rights to claim interest by the depositors and creditors on the first 70% distribution upon the three major cases of Liquidation of Canal Bank and Trust Company, , (1947); Bank of Baton Rouge v. Hart Estate, 216 La.
  • Miller v. Miller 321 So. 2d 318 La. 1975
    From this premise the Court reasoned that it could not add interest to the original judgment since that judgment was silent as to interest, citing Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , (1947); Factors' & Traders' Ins.
  • Succession of Menendez 155 So. 2d 212 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
    372 , ; Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , ; In re Phoenix Building & Homestead Ass’n, 203 La.
  • Succession of Danneel 152 So. 2d 29 La. 1963
    565 , , and repeated in Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , , that judgments homologating accounts are final and have the authority of the thing adjudged, had any application here in view of the homologation by the court of the curator’s provisional account on which Dr. Bernhard was listed as a creditor for $7100.00.
  • Davis v. Le Blanc 149 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    Viser v. Viser, La., ; Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , .
  • Viser v. Viser 146 So. 2d 409 La. 1962
    Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , ; factors’ & Traders’ Ins.
  • Irving v. E. Sondheimer Co. 126 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    The later case of Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Company, 1947, , , at page 851, had this to say about the Grennon case: “In a very able opinion written by the Hon.
  • Succession of Nock 119 So. 2d 476 La. 1960
    296, 298 .” This principle of law was approvingly cited in Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , ; Dowling v. Canal Bank & Trust Co., 216 La.
  • Curet v. Hiern 95 So. 2d 699 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1957
    128 , ; Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , ; State v. Standard Oil Co. of Louisiana, 188 La.
  • Succession of Kippers 91 So. 2d 346 La. 1956
    Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , .
  • State v. U-Drive It Car Co. 79 So. 2d 590 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    However, resort need not be had to administrative construction where the statute is clear and unambiguous; nor will it be followed where it is clearly erroneous.” The same rule prevails in this State and has been enunciated in the relatively recent case of Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Company, 1947, , , wherein the court during the course of its opinion asserted:— “While it is the generally accepted rule that the contemporaneous construction given a statute by those charged with its exe
  • In re Interstate Trust & Banking Co. 64 So. 2d 240 La. 1953
    Article 2925, LSA-Civil Code; Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , ; Bank of Baton Rouge v. Hart Estate, Inc., 216 La.
  • Gulf Shipside Storage Corporation v. Thames 46 So. 2d 62 La. 1950
    601 and Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , .
  • Bank of Baton Rouge v. Hart Estate, Inc. 44 So. 2d 311 La. 1950
    The resume of the pleadings and the statement of facts so far made reveal that we are confronted with issues which are similar in almost every respect to those which appeared before this Court in the the case of Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Co., , .
  • City Nat. Bank v. Louisiana Sav. Bank & Trust Co. 43 So. 2d 602 La. 1949
    Article 2948, Civil Code; Liquidation of Canal Bank & Trust Company, , .
  • Dowling v. Canal Bank & Trust Co. 43 So. 2d 763 La. 1949
    On appeal, we reviewed this dispute in the suit of Liquidation of Canal Bank Trust Co., , , wherein we pointed out the history of the liquidation, which it is not now necessary to repeat.