DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Succession of Land, 31 So. 2d 609.

41 citing documents.

  • State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. v. Callahan 571 So. 2d 852 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
  • Cason v. Cason 564 So. 2d 808 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    342 (La.App.2d Cir.1940); , (1947); Abraham v. Abraham, 230 La.
  • Succession of McVay v. McVay 476 So. 2d 1070 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
    342 (La.App.2d Cir.1940); , (1947); Abraham v. Abraham, 230 La.
  • Succession of Miller 405 So. 2d 812 La. 1981
  • Boagni v. Waterbury 403 So. 2d 856 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Bruyninckx v. Woodward, 217 La.
  • Curtis v. Curtis 403 So. 2d 56 La. 1981
  • Guidry v. Houston General Ins. Co. 396 So. 2d 578 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1981
    Defendant argues that if this Court should find that the hearsay evidence was inadmissible, we should consider its admission to be harmless error and cites , (1947) where the court stated, on page : "John R. Land, Jr., contended that during the trial in the lower court considerable parol evidence was admitted, largely hearsay or self-serving declarations purporting to have been made by parties deceased.
  • Matter of Succession of Vice 385 So. 2d 554 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    Bruyninckx v. Woodward, 217 La.
  • Succession of Tebo 358 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
    404 , , although—as in any manual gift—delivery must be had to make the gift effective, Succession of Land, 1947, , .
  • Guilott v. Guilott 326 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1976
    Bruynickx v. Woodward, 217 La.
  • Forest Oil Corp. v. Wood 240 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    In , (1947) the wife acquired certain bonds under an agreement compromising litigation.
  • Paxton v. Bramlette 228 So. 2d 161 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
    Bruyninckx v. Woodward, 217 La.
  • Gregory v. Gregory 223 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
    App.2d Cir. 1940); , (1947); Abraham v. Abraham, 230 La.
  • Ardoin v. LeBleu 208 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    (1947); Abunza v. *569 Olivier, 230 La.
  • Succession of Sonnier 208 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
    (1947); Abunza v. *569 Olivier, 230 La.
  • Succession of Guerre 197 So. 2d 738 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1967
    574 , (1948); , (1947); Succession of Raborn, 210 La.
  • Voelker v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 190 So. 2d 136 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
    524, 538 , ; , ; Guerra v. W. J. Young Construction Company, La.App., ; Bertoli v. Flabiano, La.App., 80 .
  • Levy v. Joseph 180 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    1071 , (syllabus 5) ; Succession of Land , (syllabus 9); Giamanco v. Giamanco, La.App.
  • Bordelon v. Bordelon 177 So. 2d 137 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    Abunza v. Olivier, 230 La.
  • Succession of Weis 162 So. 2d 791 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
    In , (see Syllabus 14), a testatrix purchased United States Bonds which were made out or issued to her "or" her daughter.
  • Succession of Hollier 158 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    Abunza v. Olivier, 230 La.
  • Distinguished Giamanco v. Giamanco 131 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    relied on by counsel, is clearly distinguishable in that, there, it was found that the community funds deposited in Mrs. Land's commercial account were inconsequential.'
  • Succession of Blades 127 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    2334, 2402, 2405; , ; Succession of Ipser, 180 La.
  • Succession of McCrocklin 126 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    In the Succession of *367 Land, 1947, , , the court denied there was a manual gift.
  • Odom v. Odom 121 So. 2d 8 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    Succession of Land, 1947, , ; Abunza v. Olivier, 1956, 230 La.
  • Prieto Lumber Co. v. Shoultz 111 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    1019 , ; , ; Janney v. Calmes, 212 La.
  • Barnes Furniture Store v. Young 111 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    756 , ; , ; Robinson v. Hunt, 211 La.
  • Succession of Turner 103 So. 2d 91 La. 1958
    756 , *211 ; , ; Robinson v. Hunt, 211 La.
  • Succession of Stewart 100 So. 2d 228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    574 , ]; and , , and Winsberg v. Winsberg, supra [ 220 La.
  • Slater v. Culpepper 99 So. 2d 348 La. 1957
    8 ; , ; Cameron v. Rowland, 215 La.
  • Weems v. Medak 93 So. 2d 217 La. 1957
    43 , ; , ; and Johnson v. Johnson, 213 La.
  • Succession of Hemenway 83 So. 2d 377 La. 1955
    8 ; , ; Cameron v. Rowland, 215 La.
  • Succession of Gladney 67 So. 2d 547 La. 1953
    The opponent appellants contend that the United States Savings Bonds create a contractual relationship between the purchasers and the U. S. Government, but that the Louisiana law on devolution of property-must be applied, , ; Succession of Geagan, 212 La, 574, ; and Winsberg v. Winsberg, 220 La.
  • Slater v. Culpepper 64 So. 2d 234 La. 1953
    Co-owner bonds, like those under consideration here, were in dispute in , .
  • Succession of Le Jeune 59 So. 2d 446 La. 1952
    Moreover, in view of the other provisions of Article 2334 (defining separate and community property) and those of 2402 of the Civil Code and the jurisprudence thereunder, Houghton v. Hall, supra; , and De Maupassant v. Clayton, 214 La.
  • Winsberg v. Winsberg 56 So. 2d 730 La. 1952
    Adoption of this course is not novel; it is consonant with the views we have heretofore expressed in other cases when the right of a forced heir to his legitime was concerned, , , and the share of the wife to the community estate was at stake, Succession of Geagan, 212 La.
  • Distinguished Bruyninckx v. Woodward 47 So. 2d 478 La. 1950
    relied on by counsel, is clearly distinguishable in that, there, it was found that the community funds deposited in Mrs. Land’s commercial account were inconsequential.
  • Sun Oil Co. v. Smith 43 So. 2d 148 La. 1949
    1019 , ; , ; Janney v. Calmes et al., 212 La.
  • De Maupassant v. Clayton 38 So. 2d 791 La. 1949
    Civil Code Articles 2334, 2402 and 2386; , .
  • Janney v. Calmes 33 So. 2d 510 La. 1947
    ny in this suit what he has solemnly acknowledged in another judicial proceeding, and in view of the fact that there was no allegation in this plea that Caplow was deceived, misled, or damaged, the judgment sustaining the plea of estoppel by record, in our opinion, constituted error and must be reversed.” Again, recognition of that doctrine was given in the more recent case of , , wherein we said and held: “John R. Land, Jr., further contended that Mrs. Triplett was estopped from denying that ce
  • Succession of Geagan 33 So. 2d 118 La. 1947
    Despite our finding that under the law of this state these bonds are community property, we are bound to give full force and effect to the laws- and regulations governing United States Savings Bonds, as pointed out by this court in -, , and, as the purchaser designated his son as beneficiary in case of death, under these laws and regulations we must recognize William J. Geagan, Jr., as full owner of these particular bonds.