Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Johnson v. Johnson, 36 So. 2d 396.

23 citing documents.

Camel v. Waller 526 So. 2d 1086 La. 1988
(1948); Mathews v. D'Asaro, 14 La.App.
Cooper v. Heirs of Cooper 421 So. 2d 314 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Smith v. Smith, supra; , (1948).
Curtis v. Curtis 403 So. 2d 56 La. 1981
509 , (1956); , (1948); Gogreve v. Dehon, 41 La.
Blanc v. Succession of Simon 295 So. 2d 569 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
A last allegation of defendant is that under the established jurisprudence of this state, [ , (1948) and cases cited therein] the burden rests upon the spouse (or heir) who claims property to be separate to establish ownership by positive evidence “dehors the recital of a deed”.
Kempff v. Morgan 291 So. 2d 520 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
Prior to the Ducuy case, a number of decisions [ , (1948)] had refused to award stipulated damages unless the seller had acted in bad faith or had refused to comply with the contract.
Daigre v. Cochrane 287 So. 2d 539 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
37, 39, 1933 ; , (1948); Succession of Lejeune, 221 La.
Criticized Wells v. Spears 255 So. 2d 215 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Seller’s , , is without foundation.
Liuzza v. Heirs of Nunzio 241 So. 2d 277 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
Pierre v. Chevalier 233 So. 2d 61 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
This was the rationale of the Court’s , (1948), but Chief Justice Fournet, writing for the majority in Ducuy v. Falgoust, supra, said: “This conclusion necessarily disposes of the contentions of the plaintiffs and we will not, therefore, follow the holding in the case of Johnson v. Johnson, supra.
Boulet v. Fruge 221 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
Kay v. Carter 142 So. 2d 836 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
247 ; , .” The buy and sell contract providing for the thirty-day period allowing the seller to perfect title is clear and unambiguous on its face.
Locantro v. Petrie 144 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
860 , ; , ; Cameron v. Rowland, 215 La.
Van Horn v. Vining 133 So. 2d 901 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
37, 39 ; , ; Succession of LeJeune, 221 La.
Poche v. Ruiz 119 So. 2d 469 La. 1960
*587 , , as well as of my dissent in Ducuy v. Falgoust, 228 La.
Taylor v. Dunn 97 So. 2d 415 La. 1957
37, 39 ; , ; Succession of LeJeune, 221 La.
Weems v. Medak 93 So. 2d 217 La. 1957
Smith v. Smith 89 So. 2d 55 La. 1956
Ducuy v. Falgoust 83 So. 2d 118 La. 1955
and authorities therein cited.
Hastings v. McDowell 75 So. 2d 383 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Coney v. Coney 56 So. 2d 841 La. 1951
*843 860, ; , ; Cameron v. Rowland, 215 La.
Coney v. Coney 56 So. 2d 841 La. 1951
860 , ; , ; Cameron v. Rowland, 215 La.
City of New Orleans v. Ricca 46 So. 2d 505 La. 1950
Lear v. Great National Development Company, Inc., supra, , ; Schaub v. O’Quin, 214 La.
Schaub v. O'Quin 38 So. 2d 63 La. 1948