DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Lemoine v. Lacour, 34 So. 2d 392.

25 citing documents.

  • City Bank and Trust v. Scott 575 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
    (1948), reiterated the Kernan rule, finding that the writing, Received from Mr. Clifton Lemoine $35.00 for payment on place, was not a sufficient base upon which to admit parol to establish the identity of immovable property and to require specific performance of the alleged written contract.
  • Duncan v. Paragon Resources, Inc. 417 So. 2d 850 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
  • Speight v. Dowden 405 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    Sup.Ct., 1972; Lemoine vs. Lacour [ ] , La.
  • Langevin v. Howard 363 So. 2d 1209 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1979
    155 (1893); , (1948) and Jackson v. Harris, 18 La.App.
  • Bostick v. Foret 351 So. 2d 238 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
  • Tullis v. Aertker 352 So. 2d 415 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1977
    397 (1924); , (1948); Bordelon v. Crabtree, 216 La.
  • Tinney v. Lauve 280 So. 2d 588 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
  • JH Jenkins Contractors, Inc. v. Farriel 246 So. 2d 340 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
    as follows: "The writings which defendants present as establishing their titles are not only insufficient per se for that purpose, but they are so defective as not to serve as a basis upon which a title could be built up or eked out by parol.
  • Carter v. Moore 248 So. 2d 813 La. 1971
    See: Civil Code Article 2275; , (1948) and Tircuit v. Burton-Swartz Cypress Co., 162 La.
  • Robichaux v. Pool 209 So. 2d 77 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
    2d 879 ; , ; Ceromi v. Harris, 187 La.
  • Breaux v. Pan American Petroleum Corporation 163 So. 2d 406 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
  • Allen v. George 110 So. 2d 587 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
  • Blevins v. Manufacturers Record Publishing Co. 105 So. 2d 392 La. 1958
  • Patterson v. City of De Ridder 103 So. 2d 68 La. 1958
    6 ; , ); when requested for the first time in application for rehearing after judgment has been signed (Reagor v. First National Life Ins.
  • Davis v. Preston 102 So. 2d 788 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    The judgment as to the alternative demand was not disturbed, , .
  • Haney v. Dunn 96 So. 2d 243 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
  • Pierce v. Griffin 95 So. 2d 190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    867 ; , , and Walker v. Ferchaud, 210 La.
  • Sharp v. Sharp 81 So. 2d 820 La. 1955
    “Under our modern jurisprudence, in the interest of justice, the technical rules of pleading have been greatly relaxed, and a plaintiff now is accorded the privilege of.
  • Overruled American Insurance v. Mr. Fog, Inc. 81 So. 2d 429 La. 1955
    789 , ; , ; McCarthy v. Osborn, 223 La.
  • Sexton v. Waggoner 66 So. 2d 634 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
    Lemoine v. Lacour, 1948, , .
  • Serio v. Chadwick 66 So. 2d 9 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
    In support of these contentions counsel refer to Lemoine v. Lacour et ux., 1948, , , holding that under our jurisprudence, in the interest of justice, the technical rules of pleading have been greatly relaxed, and a litigant now is accorded the privilege of amending his pleadings so as to state a cause of action or defense if he can before determination of the suit.
  • McGee v. Police Jury of Caddo Parish 66 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    233 ; Pool v. Pool, La.App., 1944, ; Lemoine v. Lacour, 1948, , ; Pancoast v. Cooperative Cab Company, La.App., 1948, ; Douglas v. Haro, 1949, 214 La.
  • McCarthy v. Osborn 65 So. 2d 776 La. 1953
  • McGee v. Finley 59 So. 2d 242 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    789 , , and cases cited, , .
  • Poulos v. Liuzza 43 So. 2d 59 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1949
    110, , 394, in construing an act *Page 61 of sale of real property, the Supreme Court said: "* * * Parol evidence to establish identity is allowable, as is likewise parol evidence of possession, in aid of a defective or ambiguous description; but this is only in cases where there is a sufficient body in