Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Houeye v. St. Helena Parish School Board, 35 So. 2d 739.

17 citing documents.

Durden v. Durden 165 So. 3d 1131 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
Helena Parish School Bd., , (1948); State ex rel.
RHODES STEEL BLDGS. v. Walker Const. Co. 813 So. 2d 1171 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2002
Helena Parish School Bd., , (1948).
Clarco Pipeline Co. v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 383 So. 2d 1296 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
Helena Parish School Board, , Mares v. La.
Hood Motor Company, Inc. v. Lawrence 320 So. 2d 111 La. 1975
Helena Parish School Board, , (1948).
Distinguished Hill v. Caddo Parish School Board 250 So. 2d 446 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
Helena Parish School Board, , (1948) cited by appellee, is distinguishable in that in Houeye the Court was called on to review discretionary action on the part of the school board, the board having properly performed its ministerial duties.
Granderson v. Orleans Parish School Board 216 So. 2d 643 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1969
In its first decision which is reported in , , all that the Court held was that a writ of mandamus does not lie to review the decision of a school board.
Pittman Construction Co. v. Housing Authority 179 So. 2d 900 La. 1965
Helena Parish School Board, , , decided before the enactment of the Code of Civil Procedure, this court said: “ * * it is the well settled jurisprudence of this court that the right to resort to summary proceedings * * * cannot be extended beyond the cases expressly authorized by law.
State ex rel. Wanner v. Fitzgerald 163 So. 2d 819 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1964
Helena Parish School Board, , , the Supreme Court said: “The writ of mandamus is defined in the Code of Practice to be ‘an order *823 issued in the name of the State by a tribunal of competent jurisdiction, and addressed to an individual or corporation, or court of inferior jurisdiction, ■directing it to perform some certain act bel
State ex rel. Louisiana State Pharmaceutical Ass'n v. Louisiana Board of Pharmacy 153 So. 2d 514 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
Helena Parish School Board, , , in characterizing and limiting the application of the writ of mandamus, the Supreme Court, at page 740 of 35 So.2d, said: “ * * * It only lies to compel the performance of duties that are purely ministerial in nature, and when they are so clear and specific that no element of discretion is left in the
State Ex Rel. Summit Fidelity and Surety Company v. Police Jury of Rapides Parish 131 So. 2d 623 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Helena Parish School Board, , .
State Ex Rel. Torrance v. City of Shreveport 93 So. 2d 187 La. 1957
Helena Parish School Board, , and cases there cited.
State Ex Rel. Le Blanc v. Democratic State Central Committee 86 So. 2d 192 La. 1956
Helena Parish School Board, , .
State Ex Rel. Fields v. Rapides Parish School Board 79 So. 2d 312 La. 1955
Helena Parish School Board, , and State ex rel.
Overruled Houeye v. St. Helena Parish School Board 67 So. 2d 553 La. 1953
State Ex Rel. Eberle v. Orleans Parish School Board 59 So. 2d 177 La. 1952
Helena Parish School Board, , and cases cited therein, neither mandamus nor summary proceedings are authorized under Act 250 of 1944, which act amended Act No. 100 of 1922, all of which acts are now incorporated in LSA-R.S.
Voinche v. Lecompte Trade School 55 So. 2d 889 La. 1951
Helena Parish School Board, , , it was held that where a right of action arises by.special Legislative act, which also prescribes the remedy, by ordinary proceedings, then summary proceedings are not authorized.
Houeye v. St. Helena Parish School Board 56 So. 2d 413 La. 1951