Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Jefferson Lake Sulphur Co. v. State, 34 So. 2d 331.

21 citing documents.

Vallien v. State Ex Rel. Dept. of Transp. and Dev. 812 So. 2d 894 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
Head's Video Poker Co. v. Jordan 731 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1999
(1947); see also, Louisiana Gaming, supra.
Succession of Lauga 624 So. 2d 1156 La. 1993
Const. art. V, § 1; , (1948); (La.App.
State, Department of Transportation & Development v. Kass 559 So. 2d 52 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1990
1029 , (1944); Jefferson Lake Sulphur Company, , (1947).
State, Dept. of Transp. & Develop. v. Taylor 461 So. 2d 1282 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
1029 , Jefferson Lake Sulphur Company
Bonnette v. Karst 261 So. 2d 589 La. 1972
Louisiana Paving Co. v. Louisiana Department of Highways 205 So. 2d 445 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
760 , ; , ; and Southern Construction Co. v. Housing Authority, La.App., .
Southern Construction Co. v. Housing Authority of Opelousas 189 So. 2d 454 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
687 , ; , ; Hamberlin v. Tangipahoa Parish School Board, 210 La.
Miller v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 190 So. 2d 75 La. 1966
483 , ; Jefferson Lake Sulphur Company, , ; State v. Walker, 233 La.
Pittman Const. Co. v. Housing Auth. of New Orleans 169 So. 2d 122 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
483 , ; , ; State ex rel.
State Licensing Bd. of Con. v. State Civil Serv. Com'n 110 So. 2d 847 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
Duree v. STATE, DEPT. OF INSTITUTIONS 96 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
For these reasons, and also because it is well settled that the constitutional provision only requires legislative consent to the suit against the State without necessity of approval by the Governor, , , we cannot accede to the State's argument that the Governor's veto bars the present suit authorized by the legislature, or that the Act is unconstitutional because of these circumstances.
State Ex Rel. Anderson v. Walker 98 So. 2d 153 La. 1957
483 , and Jefferson Lake Sulphur Company, Inc., v. State, , .
Stephens v. Natchitoches Parish School Board 96 So. 2d 396 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1957
194 , ; Jefferson Lake Sulphur Company, Inc. v. State, 1947, , ; Preuett v. State, La.App., 1953, .
Duree v. State ex rel. Department of Institutions 96 So. 2d 854 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
For these reasons, and also because it is well settled that the constitutional provision only requires legislative consent to the suit against the State without necessity ■of approval by the Governor, , , we cannot accede to the State’s argument that the Governor’s veto bars the present suit authorized by the legislature, ■or that the Act is unconstitutional because ■of these circumstances.
Reeves v. State 94 So. 2d 1 La. 1957
1029 , and Jefferson Lake Sulphur Co., Inc., v. State, , .
Gilmore v. State 79 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Jefferson Lake Sulphur Co. v. Kolb 76 So. 2d 546 La. 1954
The Legislature of 1954, by Act No. 363, appropriated the sum of $897,465.72 to pay a claim of the Jefferson Lake Sulphur Company against the State of Louisiana, the validity of which had been judicially recognized by a decision of this court, , .
Preuett v. STATE DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS 62 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
Bordelon v. State 59 So. 2d 231 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
194 , ; Jefferson Lake Sulphur Co., , .
Fouchaux v. Board of Com'rs of Port of New Orleans 35 So. 2d 738 La. 1948
which was handed down on December 15, 1947, are authority that the Legislature may authorize suit against the State by resolution.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by