DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Parker, Seale & Kelton v. Messina, 36 So. 2d 724.

13 citing documents.

  • ANR Pipeline Co. v. Louisiana Tax Com'n 923 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2005
    Parker, Seale & , (1948).
  • Donica v. Donica 347 So. 2d 1259 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    See Parker, Seale & , 36 So,2d 724 (1948); and Barranger, Barranger & (La.App.
  • Gauthreaux v. Gauthreaux 315 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
    [4] Parker, Seale & , (1948); August v. Blache, 200 La.
  • Jack v. Jack 240 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
    335 ; Parker, Seale & , ; Kalpakis v. Kalpakis, 221 La.
  • Shockley v. Shockley 141 So. 2d 64 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    *66 Parker, Seale & , (1948); Glorioso v. Glorioso, 223 La.
  • Meyer v. Howard 136 So. 2d 805 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    Parker, Seale & , ; Chapman v. Chapman, La.App., ; Franks v. Franks, 236 La.
  • Romero v. Leger 133 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    Furthermore, under the jurisprudence of this state a wife cannot agree with her attorney for any specified fee which the community might be liable for, as this fee is allowed and fixed by the court on a quantum meruit basis (see Tanner v. Tanner, supra; Mouton, Champagne & Colomb v. Bernard, La.App., ; Parker, Seale & , ).
  • Alderman v. Henderson 130 So. 2d 157 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    Parker, Seale & Kelton v. Messina, 1948, , .
  • Miguez v. Miguez 128 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    See Parker, Seale & , and the cases cited therein.
  • Tanner v. Tanner 86 So. 2d 80 La. 1956
    702 , and Parker, Seale & , .
  • Glorioso v. Glorioso 65 So. 2d 794 La. 1953
    690 , and Parker, Seale & , .
  • Uchello v. Uchello 58 So. 2d 385 La. 1952
    Counsel also call attention to the value of the gross estate of the Uchellos, inventoried at $143,112.83; to the fact that cash from assets of the community, after sale, amounted to $105,529.22, of which there remained some $26,500 for partition after payment of mortgages, federal taxes and penalties, and all other expenses; and cite the case of Parker, Seale & , (a suit attended with many difficulties), wherein an award of $1,250 \vas allowed the attorneys for their services to the wife in
  • Uchello v. Uchello 58 So. 2d 385 La. 1952
    Counsel also call attention to the value of the gross estate of the Uchellos, inventoried at $143,112.83; to the fact that cash from assets of the community, after sale, amounted to $105,529.22, of which there remained some $26,500 for partition -after payment of mortgages, federal taxes and penalties, and all other expenses; and cite the case of Parker, Seale & , (a suit attended with many difficulties), wherein an award of $1,250 was allowed the attorneys for their services to the wife in