Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Koob v. Cooperative Cab Co., 35 So. 2d 849.

95 citing documents.

Tresche v. Callaway 147 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
250 , ; , ; Evans v. Walker, La.App., ; Gerrets v. Reed, La.App., ; Huerstel v. L. Mangano & Co., La.App., ; Broughton v. Touchstone, La.App., ; Sonnier v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., La.App., ; Chase v. Burley, La.App., 76 So.2d
Williams v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance 148 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
2d 292 (1945); , (1948); Ryan v. The Allstate Insurance Company, 232 La.
Emmco Insurance Company v. Carambat 145 So. 2d 83 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Chiasson v. Connecticut Fire Insurance 144 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
And then his failure to yield the right of way will constitute negligence only if he was or should have been aware of the impending danger in sufficient time to avert the collision.” , ; Kientz v. Charles Dennery Inc., 209 La.
Seal v. American Fire & Casualty Co. 144 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
His failure to see the dump truck beforehand is of no moment for, even if he had seen it, under the holding of the Supreme Court in Koob v. Cooperative Cab Co., et al., , , he had the *173 right to assume that the driver from the less favored street would observe the law and bring his car to a stop before entering the intersection and, further, he had the right to indulge in that assumption until he should have seen that the truck driver was not going to obey the law.
George v. Barros 142 So. 2d 171 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
as follows: “The law in this state is well settled that a motorist who is proceeding on a right-of-way street, upon approaching an intersection where traffic is required under a city ordinance, and is warned by stop signs, to come to a complete stop before entering the intersection, should not be
Wise v. Prescott 142 So. 2d 613 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Central National Insurance v. Zorratti 141 So. 2d 464 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Nix v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., La.App., ; Blashfield’s Cyclopedia of Automobile Law and Practice, Permanent Ed., Vol.
Bergeron v. Hetherwick 140 So. 2d 440 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
: Dauzat v. Rehage, La.App., .
Emmco Insurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. 138 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
831 , ; , *825 ; Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc., 209 La.
Wells v. Causey 137 So. 2d 693 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
144 , ; , ; Ryan v. Allstate Insurance Company, 232 La.
Dilworth v. Roberts 138 So. 2d 453 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
“ ‘ , , where a stop sign was involved, the Court said: *456 “ ‘ * * * The motorist on the right-of-way street, with knowledge of the location of such a stop sign, has a right to assume that any driver approaching the intersection from the less favored street will observe the law and bring his car to a c
Central Louisiana Electric Company v. Hodges 137 So. 2d 132 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
McCoy v. State Farm Mutual Ins.
Le Beau v. Baton Rouge Bus Co. 136 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
" , , where a stop sign was involved, the Court said: "`* * * The motorist on the right-of-way street, with knowledge of the location of such a stop sign, has a right to assume that any driver approaching the intersection from the less favored street will observe the law and bring his car to a complete
Plunkett v. Department of Highways 135 So. 2d 74 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
In discussing and resolving the respective duties and rights of motorists when approaching and entering intersections, the Supreme Court, , , very aptly stated: “The law in this state is well settled that a motorist who is proceeding on a right-of-way street, upon approaching an intersection where traffic is required under a city ordinance, and is warned by stop signs, to come to a complete stop before entering the intersection, should
Faulkner v. Ryder Tank Lines, Inc. 135 So. 2d 494 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Hilton v. Bankers Fire & Marine Insurance Company 134 So. 2d 82 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
In the recent case of McCoy v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., supra, , , in which our Supreme Court held as follows: "* * * The motorist on the right-of-way street, with knowledge of the location of such a stop sign, has a right to assume that any driver approaching the intersection from the less favored street will observe the law and bring his car to a complete stop
Patterson v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company 131 So. 2d 147 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Counsel for defendant, Hardware Mutual, strenuously urges the legal proposition that the driver of a vehicle entering an intersection is required to make observation of traffic, despite his right-of-way by reason of traffic signals, citing Moss v. Travelers Insurance Company, La.App., ; , ; Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc., 290 La.
Guarisco v. Swindle 132 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Youngblood v. Robison et al., 239 La.
Hernandez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. 128 So. 2d 833 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
564 , ; , ; Henderson v. Central Mutual Insurance Co., 238 La.
Warner v. Insurance Co. of State of Pennsylvania 129 So. 2d 320 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
831 , ; , ; Nix v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., La.App., ."
McCoy v. State Farm Mutual Ins. Co. 129 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
where a stop sign was involved, the Supreme Court said: "* * * The motorist on the right-of-way street, with knowledge of the location of such a stop sign, has a right to assume that any driver approaching the intersection from the less favored street will observe the law and bring his car to a c
Noonan v. London Guarantee and Accident Company 128 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Koob v. Cooperative Cab Co., 1948, , ; Henderson v. Central Mutual Insurance Co., 1959, 238 La.
Smith v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company 128 So. 2d 235 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
It was held therein: " , , where a stop sign was involved, the Court said: "`* * * The motorist on the right-of-way street, with knowledge of the location of such a stop sign, has a right to assume that any driver approaching the intersection from the less favored street will observe the law and bring his car to a complete
Emmco Insurance Co. v. Ferrara 127 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
Cole v. Sherrill, La.App.1942, ; Koob v. Cooperative Cab Co., 1948, , .
Lavigne v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 125 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1960
Koob v. Cooperative Cab Co., 1948, , ; Steele, for Use and Benefit of Steele v. State Farm Mutual Ins.
Stansbury v. Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance 124 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
250 , , which quoted with approval from the opinion of Mr. Justice Hawthorne in Koob v. Cooperative Cab Co., et al., , .
Dennison v. Southwestern Fire and Casualty Company 124 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
564 , ; , ; Henderson v. Central Mutual Insurance Company et al., 238 La.
Winningham v. Weir 123 So. 2d 794 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Chief Justice Fournet in Henderson v. Central Mutual Insurance Company et al. absolved from blame a motorist proceeding on the favored street, and referred to a pronouncement in the case of Koob v. Cooperative Cab Company et al., 1948, , , that the danger of such an intersection is less where traffic is warned to stop by stop signs, than at a corner where no stop signs have been erected, and that a motorist enjoying the *796 right-of-way has a right to assume that any driver approaching the inte
Carr v. Grain Dealers Mutual Insurance 124 So. 2d 198 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
Koob v. Cooperative Cab Company, 1948, , ; Ryan v. Allstate Insurance Company of Chicago, 1957, 232 La.
Robinson v. Great American Indemnity Co. 120 So. 2d 855 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
831 , ; , ; Nix v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., La.App., .
Horvath v. Cancienne 120 So. 2d 666 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
250 , , , , 851: “ * * * The motorist on the right-of-way street, with knowledge of the location of such a stop sign, has a right to assume that any driver approaching the intersection from the less favored street will observe the law and bring his car to a stop before entering the intersection, and such motorist
Allen v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 120 So. 2d 372 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
831 , ; , ; Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc., 209 La.
Bowers v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Company 119 So. 2d 671 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
250 , ; , ; Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc., 209 La.
Youngblood v. Robison 118 So. 2d 431 La. 1960
where a stop sign was involved, the Court said: “ * * * The motorist on the right-of-way street, with knowledge of the location of such a stop sign, has a right to assume that any driver approaching the intersection from the less favored street will observe the law and bring his car to a complete
Henderson v. Central Mutual Insurance Company 115 So. 2d 339 La. 1959
Her dereliction of duty in the aforesaid respects, particularly in making no observation at all before entering or at the time she entered the intersection was most substantial and, without it, it can only be reasonably concluded the accident would not have occurred.” , 35 So.
Randall v. Baton Rouge Bus Co. 114 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
cited by counsel for defendant, Travelers Insurance *103 Company, the Supreme Court with Justice Hawthorne, stated: "The law in this state is well settled that a motorist who is proceeding on a right-of-way street, upon approaching an intersection where traffic is required under a city ordinance
Veal v. Audubon Insurance Company of Baton Rouge 114 So. 2d 648 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
If he brought his vehicle to a stop, there was the most wanton negligence on his part in proceeding from a position of safety into North Carrollton Avenue without ever seeing the approaching Bowers automobile; and if he made no stop, his negligence is too obvious to discuss.'" , , as follows: "The law in this state is well settled that a motorist is proceeding on a right-of-way street, upon approaching an intersection where traffic is required under a city ordinance, and is warned by stop signs,
Insurance Co. of North America v. Gore 106 So. 2d 471 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
the Court said: "The law in this state is well settled that a motorist who is proceeding on a right-of-way street, upon approaching an intersection where traffic is required under a city ordinance, and is warned by stop signs, to come to a complete stop before entering the intersection, should no
Steele Ex Rel. Steele v. State Farm Mutual Insurance 105 So. 2d 222 La. 1958
If he brought his vehicle to a stop, there was the most wanton negligence on his part in proceeding from a position of safety into North Carrollton Avenue without ever seeing the approaching Bowers automobile; and if he made no stop, his negligence is too obvious to discuss.’ ” , , the Court held: “The law in this state is well settled that a motorist who is proceeding on a right-of-way street, upon approaching an intersection where traffic is required under a city ordinance, and is warned by st
Ryan v. Allstate Insurance Company of Chicago 95 So. 2d 328 La. 1957
we held as follows: “The law in this state is well settled that a motorist who is proceeding on a right-of-way street, upon approaching an intersection where traffic is required under a city ordinance, and is warned by stop signs, to come to a complete stop before entering the intersection, shoul
Ryan v. All State Insurance Co. 86 So. 2d 126 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
Kientz v. Charles Dennery, Inc., 209 La.
Murphy v. Rowan 84 So. 2d 743 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
To substantiate this hypothesis defendants rely on the case of Koob v. Cooperative Cab Co., 1948, , .
Brown v. Gonzales 77 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
Cab Co. [ ], ; De Jean v. Hattier [La.
Anderson v. Morgan City Canning Co. 73 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
Cole v. Sherrill, La.App., .