Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite In Re Diaz, 31 So. 2d 195.

13 citing documents.

State in the Interest of B.D.L. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2016
3 civil or criminal--indeed, they are sui generis.” (1947).
State ex rel. B.D.L. 193 So. 3d 583 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2016
Such cases are not to be classed as | ¿civil or criminal — indeed, they are sui generis.” , (1947).
In Re Go Applying for Adoption 433 So. 2d 1115 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
(emphasis added) and Hargrove, supra, effectively classify juvenile proceedings as being sui generis.
In Re Salmon 318 So. 2d 897 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1975
However, , (1947), does state that certain juvenile proceedings are sui generis and not governed by the procedural requirements of either the Code of Criminal Procedure or the old Code of Practice.
In Re Rome 316 So. 2d 759 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
It is settled that juvenile proceedings are not purely civil matters but are sui generis, , (1947).
State ex rel. Johnson v. Johnson 303 So. 2d 617 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
For the sake of completeness, it should be noted that in the case of , , the Supreme Court held that neither the Code of Criminal Procedure nor the Code of Practice pertains to appeals in juvenile matters, which are sui generis.
State ex rel. Ferrygood 296 So. 2d 456 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
Under the latter article, when a case has been taken under advisement by the court notice is required but such requirements have no application to appeals from the Juvenile Court in cases concerning the general welfare of children since these are not civil cases but are sui gener-is, , .
Board of Comm'rs. of Port of New Orleans v. Splendour S. & E. Co. 273 So. 2d 19 La. 1973
1019 , (1958); , (1947); State v. Duhe, 201 La.
In re State ex rel. Williams 267 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
4th Cir. 1972), we held that the Code of Criminal Procedure is not applicable to juvenile matters, 1 and in the case of , , on page 196, the Louisiana Supreme Court stated that juvenile cases are not to be classed as civil or criminal in nature but are sui generis.
State, in Interest of Aaron 266 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
In re State ex rel. Taylor 255 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
State v. Schexnaydre 215 So. 2d 370 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1968
We are also of the opinion that the present case is not a “criminal case”, , (1947), and that the assigning of a child’s custody to an institution is not “imprisonment”, within the intent of those phrases as used in the 1948 amendment of art. VII, sec.
Ball v. Campbell 52 So. 2d 754 La. 1951