Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Tennant v. Russell, 39 So. 2d 726.

39 citing documents.

Paul v. State, Department of Public Safety 182 So. 3d 178 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2015
does not constitute a vested right.” Church Mutual Insurance Company, 145 So.3d at 281 , quoting Sawicki v. K/S Stavanger Prince, 2001-0528 (La.12/7/01), , , (1949).
Church Mutual Insurance Co. v. Dardar 145 So. 3d 271 La. 2014
does not constitute a vested right.” Sawicki v. K/S Stavanger Prince, 01-0528, p. 10 (La.12/7/01), , , (1949).
LA. STATE EMP. RETIREMENT SYSTEM v. McWilliams 996 So. 2d 1036 La. 2008
Sawicki v. K/S Stavanger Prince, XXXX-XXXX p. 10 (La.12/7/01), , , (1949)[quoting 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 215, p. 624; see also Smith v. Bd.
Aguillard v. Crowley Garment Mfg. Co. 824 So. 2d 347 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2002
4 Cir.), writ denied, , (1949) (emphasis added).
Sawicki v. K/S STAVANGER PRINCE 802 So. 2d 598 La. 2001
(1949) [quoting 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 215, p. 624].
Alleman v. Ke-Co, Inc. 783 So. 2d 409 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2001
does not constitute a vested right.” Tennant v. Russell , (1949) [quoting 16 C.J.S., Constitutional Law, § 215, p. 624], Since the offset awarded to LWCC was conditioned upon Alleman receiving Social Security disability benefits, we hold that it did not obtain a vested | ^property right via the stipulated judgment.
Picard v. Vermilion Parish School Bd. 742 So. 2d 589 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1999
Tennant *593 v. Russell, , (1949).
Fairbanks v. Tulane University 731 So. 2d 983 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1999
362 So.2d at 808 -09 ( , (1949)).
Adams v. City of Baton Rouge 673 So. 2d 624 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Rico v. Vangundy, 461 So.2d at 462 , , (1949), (La.App.
Blanchard v. City Parish of East Baton Rouge 674 So. 2d 317 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1996
Rico v. Vangundy, 461 So.2d at 462 , , (1949), (La.App.
Palomeque v. Prudhomme 664 So. 2d 86 La. 1995
Palomeque v. Prudhomme 664 So. 2d 88 La. 1995
MacRellis v. SOUTHWEST LOUISIANA IND. CENTER 657 So. 2d 135 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1995
Rousselle v. Plaquemines Parish School Board 620 So. 2d 946 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
does not constitute a vested right.” Voelkel v. Harrison, supra at 726
Heirs of Viator v. Tri-Parish Investors, Ltd. 618 So. 2d 36 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1993
does not constitute a vested right.”
Henderson v. Pacific Marine Ins. Co. 611 So. 2d 822 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1992
Voelkel v. Harrison 572 So. 2d 724 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
Adobe Oil & Gas Corp. v. MacDonell 480 So. 2d 961 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
(1949), rights are vested “when ‘the right to enjoyment, present or prospective, has become the property of some particular person or persons as a present interest.
Rico v. Vangundy 461 So. 2d 458 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1984
Terrebonne v. South Lafourche Tidal Control 445 So. 2d 1221 La. 1984
Draughn v. Mart 411 So. 2d 1188 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
Bridgeman & Conway v. Korner Realty Co., Inc. 405 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
[1] , , also see Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. California Co., 241 La.
Clements v. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC. 391 So. 2d 66 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
[8] , ; Berteau v. Weiner Corp., La.App., .
Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc. 373 So. 2d 102 La. 1979
(1949); Succession of Rice, 147 La.
Berteau v. Wiener Corp. 362 So. 2d 806 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc. 353 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1978
[4] , ; Succession of Rice, 147 La.
Rodriguez v. City Civil Serv. Com'n for Par. of NO 337 So. 2d 308 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
Krebs v. Bailey's Equipment Rentals, Inc. 328 So. 2d 775 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1976
Bye v. Giarrusso 321 So. 2d 58 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
(1949) “vested rights” are defined as follows: “A right is a vested right when the right to enjoyment, present or prospective, has become the property of some particular person as a present interest.
Wright v. Fontana 290 So. 2d 449 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
Parish of Jefferson v. Gonzales 288 So. 2d 65 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1974
This definition of a , (1949), at page 728: “A right is vested when ‘the right to enjoyment, present or prospective, has become the property of some particular person or persons as a present interest.
Kramer v. Graham 272 So. 2d 716 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
Stokes v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 232 So. 2d 328 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
State ex rel. Department of Highways v. Terral 206 So. 2d 307 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
(1949); Mallard v. State, 194 So.
Succession of Vlaho 140 So. 2d 226 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
Samuel J. Tennant, Jr., was employed by Mrs. Russell as her attorney to set aside an alleged fraudulent partition between herself and her husband from whom she had obtained a separation from bed and board.
Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. California Co. 132 So. 2d 845 La. 1961
"A right is vested when `the right to enjoyment, present or prospective, has become the property of some particular person or persons as a present interest.
Woodley v. Robinson 100 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
Wells v. Joseph 95 So. 2d 843 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
In other words, an inchoate right is the direct opposite of a vested right, , , as follows: “A right is vested when ‘the right to enjoyment, present or prospective, has become the property of some particular person or persons as a present interest.
Inman v. Gonzales 89 So. 2d 914 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
he litigation to which the contract might relate, but entitled him only to a privilege upon the judgment, if and when obtained, and that, notwithstanding such contract, it was within the power of the client to discontinue the suit at will, leaving to the attorney his right of action on quantum meruit for services rendered.” , .