Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite City of Shreveport v. Conrad, 33 So. 2d 503.

14 citing documents.

Jenniskens v. Parish of Jefferson 940 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2006
(1947); City of Shreveport v. Bayse, 166 La.
Palermo Land Co. v. PLANNING COM'N OF CALCASIEU PARISH 550 So. 2d 316 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
(1947); City of Shreveport v. Bayse, 166 La.
Hibernia Nat. Bank v. City of New Orleans 455 So. 2d 1239 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1984
Four States Realty Co., Inc. v. City of Baton Rouge (On Rehearing), City of Shreveport v. *1241 Conrad, , (1947); City of Shreveport v. Bayse, 166 La.
DeCuir v. Town of Marksville 426 So. 2d 766 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1983
(1947); City of Shreveport v. Bayse, 166 La.
City of Lafayette v. Butcher Air Conditioning Co. 392 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1980
339 (1926); Hunter v. City of Shreveport, supra; , (1947).
Konrad v. Parish of Jefferson 352 So. 2d 361 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1977
(1947); City of Shreveport v. Bayse, 166 La.
City of Lake Charles v. Southern Pacific Transp. Co. 310 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
339 (1926); Hunter v. City of Shreveport, supra; , (1947).
Four States Realty Co., Inc. v. City of Baton Rouge 309 So. 2d 659 La. 1975
(1947); City of Shreveport v. Bayse, 166 La.
Manuel v. Evangeline Parish Police Jury 295 So. 2d 600 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
inances adopted by local governing bodies are presumed to be valid and that the courts should not interfere with the exercise of the discretion of such bodies, nor substitute the courts’ judgment for that of the local governing authorities, except where those attacking the ordinance prove it is so clearly arbitrary and capricious as to be unreasonable and oppressive, , 33 So.
Hi-Lo Oil Company v. City of Crowley 274 So. 2d 757 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
339 (1926); Hunter v. City of Shreveport, supra; , (1947).
Akin v. Caddo Parish Police Jury 234 So. 2d 203 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1970
Meyers v. City of Baton Rouge 185 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
City of Shreveport v. Bayse, 166 La.
Archer v. City of Shreveport 85 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
wherein the defendant on being charged with flying an airplane less than 1,000 feet above the waters of Cross Lake and bringing it to rest on the waters thereof, in violation of a City ordinance, plead that the ordinance was illegal, ultra vires and unconstitutional upon the alleged grounds that
Chapman v. City of Shreveport 74 So. 2d 142 La. 1954
City of Shreveport v. Bayse, 166 La.