Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Saia, 33 So. 2d 665.

33 citing documents.

  • State of Louisiana v. Miles J. Guidry La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    This comports with the general theory that “appeals in criminal cases are not granted merely to test the correctness of the trial court’s ruling, but only to rectify injuries caused thereby.” (1947), citing State v. Cullens, 168 La.
  • State v. Guidry 271 So. 3d 275 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
    State v. Saia , , 876, , 668 (1947), citing State v. Cullens , 168 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Elvin Bryant Jinks, Jr. -Aka- Elvin Jinks La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2019
    This comports with the general theory that “appeals in criminal cases are not granted merely to test the correctness of the trial court’s ruling, but only to rectify injuries caused thereby.” (1947).
  • State v. Jinks 267 So. 3d 688 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2019
  • State of Louisiana v. Rodney Ian Barnes La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2013
    This comports with the general theory that “appeals in criminal cases are not granted merely to test the correctness of the trial court’s ruling, but only to rectify injuries caused thereby.” (1947), citing State v. Cullens, 168 La.
  • State v. Barnes 127 So. 3d 1070 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    This comports with the general theory that “appeals in criminal cases are not granted merely to test the correctness of the trial court’s ruling, but only to rectify injuries caused thereby.” , (1947), citing State v. Cullens, 168 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Jimmy James Mack La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    This comports with the general theory that “appeals in criminal cases are not granted merely to test the correctness of the trial court's ruling, but only to rectify injuries caused thereby.” (1947), citing State v. Cullens, 168 La.
  • State v. Leonard 932 So. 2d 660 La. 2006
  • State of Louisiana v. Orlon Peloquin La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    (1947), citing State v. Cullens, 168 La.
  • State v. Peloquin 888 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    (1947), citing State v. Cullens, 168 La.
  • State of Louisiana v. Charles Brown, Jr. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    (1947), citing State v. Cullens, 168 La.
  • State v. Brown 874 So. 2d 318 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2004
    (1947), citing State v. Cullens, 168 La.
  • State v. Maise 805 So. 2d 1141 La. 2002
  • State v. Shaw 785 So. 2d 34 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2001
    Id., , (1947), quoting from State v. Cullens, 168 La.
  • State v. Johnson 664 So. 2d 94 La. 1995
    (1947), citing State v. Cullens, 168 La.
  • Foster v. Hampton 352 So. 2d 197 La. 1977
  • State v. Sylvester 298 So. 2d 807 La. 1974
  • City of Crowley Firemen v. City of Crowley 264 So. 2d 368 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    859 , (1954); , (1947); (La.App.
  • State v. Pebworth 257 So. 2d 136 La. 1972
  • State v. Square 244 So. 2d 200 La. 1971
  • Hunter v. City of Shreveport 216 So. 2d 140 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1969
  • Stevens Concrete Pipe & Products, Inc. v. Burgess 202 So. 2d 498 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    52 ; , ; Meyers v. City of Baton Rouge et al., La.App., .
  • Meyers v. City of Baton Rouge 185 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    52 ; , ; State v. Rones, 223 La.
  • State v. Green 150 So. 2d 571 La. 1963
    and authorities there cited.
  • State v. Goldfinch 132 So. 2d 860 La. 1961
    871 ; , ; Schwegmann Bros. v. La.
  • State v. Rogers 132 So. 2d 819 La. 1961
    Additionally, “Insofar as we have been able to ascertain, the Louisiana Code of Criminal Procedure does not provide for any such motion in the trial of a criminal case.” , .
  • State v. Smith 99 So. 2d 8 La. 1958
    608 , ; , ; State v. Comery, 214 La.
  • State v. Emerson 98 So. 2d 225 La. 1957
    and authorities there cited.
  • Archer v. City of Shreveport 85 So. 2d 337 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
    52 ; , ; State v. Rones, 223 La.
  • State v. Sauls 77 So. 2d 8 La. 1954
    and State v. Grayson, on rehearing, 225 La.
  • Gandolfo v. Louisiana State Racing Commission 78 So. 2d 504 La. 1954
    14:90 which recites: “Gambling is the intentional conducting, or directly assisting in the conducting, as a business, of any game, contest, lottery, or contrivance whereby a person risks the loss of anything of value in order to realize a profit.” Further, , , this court, in a unanimous decision, judicially recognized it to be gambling.- As to the stated second question I have heretofore expressed the view (and I still entertain it) that a statute which licenses and, as a consequence, encourages
  • Chapman v. City of Shreveport 74 So. 2d 142 La. 1954
    52 ; , ; State v. Rones, 223 La.
  • State v. Richardson 56 So. 2d 568 La. 1951