Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Martin v. Martin, 34 So. 2d 329.

35 citing documents.

Brittany Nicole Howe, Individually and as Natural Tutrix of Grayson Konrad, a Minor v. Samantha Gafford and the … La. 2024
In Re: Kristen Nicole Dennis and Jessica Falcon Dennis Applying for Intrafamily Adoption of J.K.D. La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2024
State v. Jones 983 So. 2d 95 La. 2008
Tullier v. Tullier 464 So. 2d 278 La. 1985
1095 , (1948); Pfister v. St.
Green v. Provencal Tie Mill 411 So. 2d 1228 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
627, 628 , , , .” We cannot say the trial judge was manifestly erroneous.
Continental Casualty Co. v. Professional Trim & Upholstery, Inc. 398 So. 2d 1190 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
627, 628 , , , .” After a thorough review of the record, we find that the conclusion of the trial court is not manifestly erroneous.
Robert J. Naquin & Associates, Inc. v. Portage Plantation, Inc. 394 So. 2d 698 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
627, 628 , ; , .” Testimony by the opposing parties was in direct conflict regarding the crucial issue of whether or not the defendant granted an oral extension of the listing agreement.
Samuels v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. 342 So. 2d 661 La. 1977
State v. Dardar 241 So. 2d 905 La. 1970
1095 , ; State v. Viator, 229 La.
City of Natchitoches v. State 221 So. 2d 534 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1969
State v. Willis 221 So. 2d 39 La. 1969
1095 , , involving the same statute and section which read ‘Perform any immoral act’.
State v. Fulmer 193 So. 2d 774 La. 1967
1095 , , on the ground that the word “immoral” as used in Section 7 thereof, denouncing the crime of contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile, has a meaning of such vagueness, indefiniteness and uncertainty it does not define the type of action sought to be denounced, leaving it to each court to determine in any given c
State v. Cloud 176 So. 2d 620 La. 1965
Ory v. Griffin 162 So. 2d 97 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
627, 628 , , , .” While I am not in accord with the observation “the district judge’s conclusions must be accepted, unless they are manifestly erroneous.”; because of the opportunity of the Trial Court to see and hear the witnesses, I do believe great weight should be attached to his conclusion predicated upon such fi
State v. Wiener 161 So. 2d 755 La. 1964
1095 , ; State v. Truby, 211 La.
State v. Deutch 161 So. 2d 730 La. 1964
State v. Hertzog 131 So. 2d 788 La. 1961
1095 , (performance of an immoral act), and State v. Kraft, 214 La.
Pino v. Bennett 126 So. 2d 460 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
627, 628 , , , .” Plaintiff testified that in June or July, 1958, defendant (with whom plaintiff had had previous satisfactory dealings) called upon plaintiff, displayed plans and specifications for a building to be used as an ice skating rink and requested plaintiff to make a bid for installation of all electrical wo
Brown v. Hockenjos 95 So. 2d 353 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
627, 628 , , , .’ ” See also Vath v. Gay, 226 La.
State v. Murtes 94 So. 2d 446 La. 1957
1095 , , the legislative act therein involved was declared unconstitutional in that the word “immoral” did not have a fixed and definite meaning.
State v. Viator 87 So. 2d 115 La. 1956
1095 , , with Chief Justice Fournet as the author, we said: "* * * no one can be held accountable, or subjected to criminal prosecution, for any act done by him unless and until that act has been denounced as a crime and has been made punishable in a statute that defines the act sought to be denounced with such precisio
State v. Viator 87 So. 2d 115 La. 1956
1095 , , with Chief Justice Fournet as the author, we said: “ * * * no one can be held accountable, or subjected to criminal prosecution, for any act done by him unless and until that act has been denounced as a crime and has been made punishable in a statute that defines the act sought to be denounced with such precisi
State v. Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company 78 So. 2d 825 La. 1955
1095 , , this Court held: “Courts can do no more than interpret and construe statutes.
State v. Roth 74 So. 2d 392 La. 1954
1095 , and State v. Truby, 211 La.
City of Shreveport v. Brewer 72 So. 2d 308 La. 1954
1095 , , wherein a person was convicted of the crime of contributing to the delinquency of a juvenile, defined under Section 7 of Article 92 of the Criminal Code, LSA-R.S.
State v. Shourds 71 So. 2d 340 La. 1954
1095 , and State v. Kraft, 214 La.
State v. MacK 71 So. 2d 315 La. 1954
1095 , ; State v. Gardner, 151 La.
During v. Thibodeaux 70 So. 2d 882 La. 1954
627, 628 , , , .” For the reasons assigned, the judgment is affirmed at appellant’s cost.
Rosenthal v. Gauthier 69 So. 2d 367 La. 1953
State v. Penniman 68 So. 2d 770 La. 1953
1095 , , wherein we refused to supply the omitted •definition of “immoral acts,” in the denounced crime of contributing to the delinquency of juveniles; and State v. Kraft, 214 La.
Cormier v. Douet 54 So. 2d 177 La. 1951
Diez v. Diez 53 So. 2d 677 La. 1951
Roy v. Louisiana State Department of Agriculture & Immigration 44 So. 2d 822 La. 1950
State v. Kraft 37 So. 2d 815 La. 1948
State v. Stewart 37 So. 2d 820 La. 1948
1095 ], (1948), has held Section 7 of Article 92 [of the Louisiana Criminal Code] to be unconstitutional.