DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Slaton v. King, 36 So. 2d 648.

31 citing documents.

  • Sue Soileau Brignac Durand v. Vistana Falls Condominium Association, Inc. La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2025
  • Dugas v. Modular Quarters, Inc. 561 So. 2d 192 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    2nd Cir.1947), reversed on other grounds, , (1948).
  • Camel v. Waller 526 So. 2d 1086 La. 1988
    509 , (1956); , (1948); Succession of Bell, 194 La.
  • Phillips v. Nereaux 357 So. 2d 813 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    736 , (1950); , (1948); Sanderson v. Frost, 198 La.
  • Succession of Miangolarra 297 So. 2d 784 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1974
    See also: , (1925); Dillon v. Freville, 129 La.
  • Succession of Pittman 282 So. 2d 799 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
  • Blalock v. Blalock 259 So. 2d 367 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1972
  • Ardoin v. LeBleu 208 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1968
  • Succession of Sonnier 208 So. 2d 562 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1968
  • Udstad v. Fertel 150 So. 2d 589 La. 1963
  • Beatty v. Vining 147 So. 2d 37 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
    295 , ; , ; Pearlstine v. Mattes, 223 La.
  • Locantro v. Petrie 144 So. 2d 742 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
  • Succession of Blades 127 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1961
    572 , ; , ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La.
  • Barnes Furniture Store v. Young 111 So. 2d 549 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    2d 148, 149 ; , ; Janney v. Calmes, 212 La.
  • Bagala v. Bagala 110 So. 2d 526 La. 1959
  • Succession of Turner 103 So. 2d 91 La. 1958
    27 , ; , ; Janney v. Calmes, 212 La.
  • Scott v. McCoy 102 So. 2d 73 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
  • Ruffino v. Hunt 99 So. 2d 34 La. 1958
    and authorities there cited.
  • Lazaro v. Lazaro 92 So. 2d 402 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    For example, in Slaton v. King, 1948, , , the husband acquired property by dation en paiement during marriage in consideration of the cancellation of a debt which was owed to him prior to marriage.
  • Succession of Hemenway 83 So. 2d 377 La. 1955
    d during the marriage creates a presumption in favor of the community, juris et de jure, unless there is contained in the deed the double declaration that the property is acquired with the separate funds of the husband and for his separate estate”; and that in the absence of such declaration *591 he is precluded “from contending that the land does not belong to the community.” , , and the numerous cases cited therein.
  • Succession of Chapman 73 So. 2d 789 La. 1954
    295 , ; , ; Lewis v. Clay, 221 La.
  • Guilbeau v. Guilbeau 71 So. 2d 129 La. 1954
  • Cryer v. Cryer 70 So. 2d 747 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    a party litigant will not be permitted to deny in this suit what he has solemnly acknowledged in another judicial proceeding, and in view of the fact that there was no allegation in this plea that Caplow was deceived, misled, or damaged, the judgment sustaining the plea of estoppel by record, in our opinion, constituted error and must be reversed.” , , 651: “There is nothing in the record to exhibit that plaintiff was misled or damaged by reason of the allegation contained in the divorce proceed
  • Pearlstine v. Mattes 67 So. 2d 582 La. 1953
  • Thomas v. Thomas 63 So. 2d 468 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1953
    ( , .)” We do not agree to the correctness of the finding.
  • Lewis v. Clay 60 So. 2d 78 La. 1952
    and authorities therein cited.
  • Succession of Dupre 51 So. 2d 317 La. 1951
  • Bruyninckx v. Woodward 47 So. 2d 478 La. 1950
    and the long lisl of authorities therein cited in support of the well-established doctrine that purchases of real estate in the name of the husband during the marriage create a presumption in favor of the community, juris et de jure, in the absence of a double declaration in the deed that the property i
  • Stone v. Stone 43 So. 2d 81 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1949
    The general rule in Louisiana, established beyond any question by a long and impressive line of jurisprudence, , , in which case numerous authorities were cited, is that acquisition of real property in the name of the husband during the marriage creates a presumption in favor of the community, juris et de jure, failing the double declaration that the property was acquired with the separate funds of the husband and
  • Jones v. Williams 39 So. 2d 746 La. 1949
  • De Maupassant v. Clayton 38 So. 2d 791 La. 1949