DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hughes v. Enloe, 38 So. 2d 225.

32 citing documents.

  • Rachal v. Highlands Ins. Co. 355 So. 2d 1355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1978
    745 , (1961); , (1948); Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., 208 La.
  • Jordan v. FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY 295 So. 2d 909 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
    Olivier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, supra; Comoletti v. Ideal Cement Company, La.App.
  • Futrell v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company 276 So. 2d 271 La. 1973
    * * *" , (1948); Wright v. National Surety Corp., 221 La.
  • Charleston v. Veri-Fresh Poultry Company, Inc. 273 So. 2d 712 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
    and authorities there cited.
  • Griffin v. Hochendel 263 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • LaCoste v. J. Ray McDermott & Co. 193 So. 2d 779 La. 1967
  • Scott v. Great American Insurance 180 So. 2d 793 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    2d 384 , 386, , which allowed total disability.
  • Smith v. Travelers Insurance Company 174 So. 2d 241 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
  • Lavergne v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Ins. Co. 171 So. 2d 751 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
    Young v. Central Surety & Insurance Corporation, La.App.
  • Kemp v. L. L. Brewton Lumber Co. 168 So. 2d 911 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    198 , (1945); , (1948); Olivier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, 241 La.
  • Occhipinti v. Marquette Casualty Company 158 So. 2d 389 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    " , , an employee sustained a hand injury producing a 25 to 35 per cent limitation of flexion therein.
  • Thomas v. Gates, Inc. 157 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    Other cases which are applicable and which we think indicate that plaintiff in the instant suit is totally and permanently disabled within the meaning of the workmen's compensation law, are: , ; Brown v. Mansfield Hardwood Lbr.
  • Anderson v. Rowan Drilling Company 150 So. 2d 828 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    Olivier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, supra; Comoletti v. Ideal Cement Company, La.App.
  • Olivier v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company 131 So. 2d 50 La. 1961
    and authorities there cited.
  • Walters v. General Accident & Fire Assur. Corp., Ltd. 119 So. 2d 550 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
  • Powell v. Travelers Insurance Company 117 So. 2d 610 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    653 , ; , ; Ranatza v. Higgins Industries, Inc., 208 La.
  • Moore v. Great American Indemnity Co. 106 So. 2d 771 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
  • Green v. Harper 103 So. 2d 474 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    Bean v. Higgins, Inc., 230 La.
  • McGee v. Reimers-Schneider Co. 102 So. 2d 566 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1958
    an employee sustained a hand injury producing a 25 to 35 per cent limitation of flexion therein.
  • Kimbrell v. Travelers Insurance Co. 83 So. 2d 561 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    Ample judicial authority for this is to be found in the following citations: Hughes v. Enloe, 1948, , ; Young v. Central Surety & Insurance Corporation, La.App.1949, ; Henry v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App.1946, ; Washington v. Independent Ice.
  • Moore v. Aysen 69 So. 2d 551 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    where compensation for total disability was awarded showed that the laborer could not do or perform his accustomed work after the ac.cident.
  • Blanchard v. Pittsburg-Des Moines Steel Co. 66 So. 2d 342 La. 1953
    Relator argues and contends that he should be awarded compensation for permanent total disability, and that because of-the injury to his thumb he is unable to perform work of the same or similar character as that which he was accustomed to perform, that is, common labor, , , recently decided by this, court.
  • Harper v. Ragus 62 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1952
    690 , ; Hughes v. Enloe, 1948, , ; Young v. Central Surety & Insurance Corporation, La.App.1949, ; Brown v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Company, La.App.1951, .
  • Blanchard v. Pittsburgh-Des Moines Steel Co. 59 So. 2d 384 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
    In support of plaintiff’s contention of permanent and total disability his learned counsel quotes extensively from Malone’s Work “Louisiana Workman’s Compensation Law and Practice” , .
  • Mottet v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. 57 So. 2d 218 La. 1952
  • Mottet v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co. 57 So. 2d 218 La. 1952
  • Brown v. Mansfield Hardwood Lbr. Co. 56 So. 2d 278 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    in which the facts with respect to the nature and degree of injury were strikingly similar, is clearly determinative of the issue herein presented.
  • Williams v. Consolidated Underwriters 50 So. 2d 55 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    Plaintiff cites and relies upon Young v. Central Surety & Insurance Corporation, La.App., , , .
  • Brown v. Mansfield Hardwood Lumber Co. 50 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    *118 The Supreme Court granted a writ of cer-tiorari, and in its opinion, , , agreed with this ¡Court on its finding of fact, namely, that the plaintiff had a permanent twenty-five to thirty-five per cent limitation of flexion in the four fingers of his right hand, but in view of the fact that the duties of his employment at the time of his injury required him to grasp fir
  • Morgan v. American Bitumuls Co. 47 So. 2d 739 La. 1950
    690 , ; , ; Lee v. International Paper Company, La.App., ; Butzman v. Delta Shipbuilding Company, Inc., et al., La.App., ; Henry v. Higgins Industries, Inc., La.App., ; Richardson v. American Employers’ Insurance Company et al., La.App., ; Gilmore v. George W. Ga
  • Scott v. Hillyer, Deutsch, Edwards, Inc. 46 So. 2d 914 La. 1950
    Relator in his application for writs to this court urged, among other things, that the Court of Appeal erred in denying to him permanent total disability under the provisions of Section 8, Subsection 1, paragraph (b), of the act, , , and Washington v. Independent Ice & Cold Storage Co., 211 La.
  • Young v. Central Surety Insurance Corporation 41 So. 2d 700 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1949