Touchet v. Kroger's Family Center
Also decided on this docket: La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., June 29, 1954 73 So. 2d 600; La. Ct. App. 1st Cir., December 23, 1930 131 So. 504; La., March 15, 1875 27 La. 191
Touchet v. Kroger's Family Center, 263 So. 2d 423 (La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972).
The holding in the court’s own words
We conclude, therefore, that there is no error in the judgment rendered by the district court rejecting plaintiff’s demands.
Quoted verbatim from the opinion — no paraphrase, nothing generated. Not yet human-reviewed. How we find the holding.
Opinion text
HOOD, Judge. This is a workmen’s compensation suit instituted by Leroy Touch et against Kroger’s Family Center and Employees National Insurance Company. Judgment was rendered by the trial court in favor of defendants, and plaintiff has appealed. The trial judge found that plaintiff had failed to prove that an accident occurred as alleged. We have reviewed all of the evidence and agree with the findings of the trial judge. We conclude, therefore, that there is no error in the judgment rendered by the district court rejecting plaintiff’s demands. The judgment appealed from is affirmed. The costs of this proceeding are assessed to plaintiff-appellant. Affirmed.