Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite O'Meara v. Union Oil Co. of California, 33 So. 2d 506.
- Moreno v. Entergy Corp. 64 So. 3d 761 La. 2011
- Moreno v. Entergy Corp. 62 So. 3d 704 La. 2011
- Broadmoor, LLC v. ERNEST N. MORIAL EXHIBITION 867 So. 2d 651 La. 2004
-
Kelty v. Brumfield
633 So. 2d 1210
La. 1994
(1947); II Davis & Pierce, Administrative Law Treatise §§ 14.1, 14.2 (3rd ed. 1994).
- Zeringue v. Lafourche Parish Office of Eligibility Determination 597 So. 2d 1142 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
-
Magnolia Coal Terminal v. Phillips Oil
576 So. 2d 475
La. 1991
(1947), where the only issues were overproduction and underproduction in violation of the conservation laws, and suit was not filed until the day before the commissioner's hearing was scheduled.
-
Socorro v. Orleans Levee Bd.
561 So. 2d 739
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
549 (1928); , (1948); (La.App.
- Magnolia Coal Terminal v. Phillips Oil Co. 561 So. 2d 732 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1990
- Polk v. STATE EX REL. DOTD 538 So. 2d 239 La. 1989
- Polk v. State ex rel. Department of Transportation & Development 538 So. 2d 239 La. 1989
- Polk v. State Through DOTD 517 So. 2d 1178 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1987
-
Dunn v. Sutton
378 So. 2d 485
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
(1947), emphasized the Commissioner's power to find the facts to which the law regarding the production and conservation of oil and gas were to be applied.
- Anderson v. State 363 So. 2d 728 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1978
- Bonomo v. Louisiana Downs, Inc. 337 So. 2d 553 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
- Upper Audubon Ass'n v. AUDUBON PARK COM'N 329 So. 2d 209 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1976
- Bounds v. STATE DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS 333 So. 2d 714 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1976
- Steeg v. Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation 329 So. 2d 719 La. 1976
-
Desormeaux v. Inexco Oil Company
298 So. 2d 897
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
939 , (1958); , (1947); (La.App.
-
Louisiana Milk Com'n v. Louisiana Com'n on Gov. Eth.
298 So. 2d 285
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
(1948); State of Louisiana ex rel.
- State Board of Education v. Anthony 289 So. 2d 279 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
- Desormeaux v. Inexco Oil Company 277 So. 2d 218 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
-
City of New Orleans v. Comiskey
232 So. 2d 840
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
O’ , (1947); Michell v. Louisiana St.
-
Crane v. Sun Oil Co.
223 So. 2d 14
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
O’Meara v. Union Oil Company of California, 1948, , ; Simmons v. Pure Oil Company, 1961, 241 La.
-
Mobil Oil Corporation v. Gill
194 So. 2d 351
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
97 , (1942); , (1947); Monsanto Chemical Co. v. Hussey, 234 La.
-
State ex rel. Bert Leasing Corp. v. Donelon
173 So. 2d 24
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1965
O’ , (1947); Porter v. O’Neal, 205 La.
- Guarisco v. Trahan 173 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
-
Allen v. Louisiana Board of Alcoholic Beverage Control
146 So. 2d 662
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
O’Meara v. Union Oil *665 Co. of California, , ; Richardson v. Parish Council, La.App., ; Marino v. City of Baton Rouge, La.App., .
-
Simmons v. Pure Oil Company
129 So. 2d 786
La. 1961
It occurs to us that this is nothing more than a collateral attack on the findings of the Commissioner, which cannot be countenanced (see O’ , ) as counsel is really saying that the Commissioner was imposed upon so that he acted improvidently.
-
Rogers v. LOUISIANA STATE BOARD OF OPTOMETRY EXAM.
126 So. 2d 628
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
O'Meara v. Union Oil Co. of California, 1947, , ; Porter v. O'Neal, 1944, 205 La.
-
Simmons v. Pure Oil Company
124 So. 2d 161
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
The Supreme Court held in O'Meara v. Union Oil Co. of California, 1947, , , that the Legislature has delegated to the Commissioner of Conservation the authority to find the facts upon which the law is to be applied.
- Monsanto Chemical Company v. Hussey 102 So. 2d 455 La. 1958
-
Feinblum v. Louisiana State Board of Optom. Exam.
97 So. 2d 657
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
Porter v. O'Neal, 205 La.
-
Hunter v. Hussey
90 So. 2d 429
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
at page 509 for practical reasons in justification of this legislative policy.
-
Johnson v. Quad Drilling Corp.
86 So. 2d 622
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
the case of O’ , 509 , from the opinion in which the district judge cited, with approval, the following language of the Supreme Court: *624 ,“We also called attention to the fact that administrative officers with fact finding powers relieved the Legislature and the judiciary from a great deal of detail work and im
-
Patorno v. Department of Public Safety, Drivers' License Division
76 So. 2d 534
La. 1954
In the case of O’ , , it is further stated: “In the case of Hunter Co., Inc., et al v. McHugh, 202 La.
-
Marino v. City of Baton Rouge
61 So. 2d 586
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
See also' O’ , ; Porter v. O’Neal, 205 La.
-
Richardson v. Parish Council of Parish of East Baton Rouge
53 So. 2d 458
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
See O’ , and cases therein cited.
-
Everett v. Phillips Petroleum Co.
51 So. 2d 87
La. 1950
See Section 11 of Act No. 157 of 1940 , .