DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Arnold v. Sun Oil Co., 48 So. 2d 369.

55 citing documents.

  • Creek Management, L.L.C. v. Unopened Succession & Unknown Heirs or Legatees of Williams 223 So. 3d 1194 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2017
    (1949); Hill v. Dees, 188 La.
  • Cockerham v. Cockerham 16 So. 3d 1264 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2009
    (1949); Hill v. Dees, 188 La.
  • Sonnier v. Conner 998 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    893 (1907); , (1949); James Harvey Ramsey Estate, (La.App.
  • Justiss Oil Company, Inc. v. Leon Hanson La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    250 [(1937)] So.2d 369 [(1949)].
  • JUSTISS OIL CO., INC. v. Hanson 996 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 2008
    250 [(1937)] , [(1949)].
  • Tilley v. Unopened Succession of Howard 976 So. 2d 851 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2008
    (1949); Hill v. Dees, 188 La.
  • In Re Succession of Moore 737 So. 2d 749 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1998
    (1950); Headrick v. Lee, supra .
  • Fleniken v. Allbritton 566 So. 2d 1106 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1990
    (1950); Headrick v. Lee, supra.
  • Salvex, Inc. v. Lewis 546 So. 2d 1309 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1989
    (1949); Tyson v. Surf Oil Co., 195 La.
  • Martin Fuel Dist., Inc. v. Trans Gulf Fuel, Inc. 496 So. 2d 473 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    780 , (1958); , (1950); "
  • Phillips v. Parker 483 So. 2d 972 La. 1986
  • Headrick v. Lee 471 So. 2d 904 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    (1950); Hill v. Dees, 188 La.
  • Dunham v. Nixon 371 So. 2d 1288 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
    (1950); Hill v. Dees, 188 La.
  • Bd. of Com'rs. Etc. v. Hunter Foundation 354 So. 2d 156 La. 1977
    (1949); Knight v. Berwick Lumber Co., 130 La.
  • Prados v. South Central Bell Telephone Company 329 So. 2d 744 La. 1976
    846 (1936); , (1949); Weber v. H. G. Hill Stores, Inc., 207 La.
  • Succession of Kemp v. Robertson 316 So. 2d 919 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
    Articles 3441, 3489, 3490, 3556(25) and 3510; Arnold v. Sun Oil Co., et al., , .
  • Collins v. Slocum 284 So. 2d 98 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
    2d 667 the court said: " , (on rehearing), is full authority for the proposition that parties relying on the law of registry and claiming under recorded muniments of title cannot ignore the facts revealed by the public records".
  • Givens v. Givens 273 So. 2d 863 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    (1950); Hill v. Dees, 188 La.
  • BOARD OF COM'RS OF PT. N. ORL. v. Delacroix Corp. 274 So. 2d 745 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1973
    the purchaser may purchase without any investigation of the title, and if the four conditions of Article 3479 of the Civil Code are met, the requirement for the ten year prescription is met.
  • Neblett v. Placid Oil Company 257 So. 2d 167 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1972
    780 , (1958); Brown v. Johnson, La.App., , , .
  • Southeastern Public Service Co. v. Barras 246 So. 2d 298 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
  • Twilbeck v. Twilbeck 192 So. 2d 907 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    412 , ; , ; Fried v. Bradley, 219 La.
  • LeBoeuf v. Malbrough 188 So. 2d 196 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    230 ; Brown v. Johnson, La.App., ; , ; Hasslocher v. Recknagel, La.App., , in support of the contention plaintiff was sufficiently put on notice by the record to deprive plaintiff of good faith reliance thereon.
  • Union Bank v. Roy 182 So. 2d 319 La. 1965
    339 , (1960); , (1950); Frost Lumber Industries, Inc. v. Harrison, 215 La.
  • Succession of Simms 175 So. 2d 113 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1965
  • Southern Natural Gas Co. v. Naquin 167 So. 2d 434 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    250 ; , ; Atlantic Refining Co. v. Golson, La.App., .
  • Menefee v. Pipes 159 So. 2d 439 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
    See also: Arnold v. Sun Oil Company, et al., , (1950).
  • Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Boudoin 154 So. 2d 239 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1963
    250 ; , ; Atlantic Refining Co. v. Golson, La.
  • ARKANSAS FUEL OIL CORPORATION v. Weber 149 So. 2d 101 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1963
    In the Wells case, , , and Wise v. Watkins, 222 La.
  • Watkins v. Zeigler 147 So. 2d 435 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1962
    250 ; , ; and stated: "* * * In order for one coowner or coheir to prescribe against the other, his possession must be clearly hostile to the rights of the other and, in such instances, it is necessary, in order to commence the running of prescription, that notice be given by the former to the latter of his int
  • Monk v. Monk 144 So. 2d 384 La. 1962
    412 , ; , ; Fried v. Bradley, 219 La.
  • Succession of Seals 142 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    735 (1919); Gill v. Robinson, 11 Orleans App. 226; , (1949).
  • British American Oil Producing Company v. Grizzaffi 135 So. 2d 559 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    250 ; , ; Atlantic Refining Co. v. Golson, La.
  • Chicago Mill and Lumber Co. v. Ayer Timber Co. 131 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    494 , ; Arnold v. Sun Oil Company, 1950, , ; Dixon v. American Liberty Oil Company, 1954, 226 La.
  • Prestridge v. Humble Oil & Refining Company 131 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    * * * * * * " , , * * * the Court, citing the rulings in the Allison, Tyson and Amerada Petroleum [Amerada Petroleum Corp. v. Reese, 195 La.
  • Harwood Oil & Mining Company v. Black 124 So. 2d 764 La. 1960
    2d 210 ; , , and the cases cited in those opinions.
  • Boyet v. Perryman 123 So. 2d 79 La. 1960
    he may purchase without any investigation of the title, and if the four conditions of Article 3479 of the LSA-Civil Code are met, he is protected by the prescription of ten years.
  • Pitre v. Peltier 122 So. 2d 867 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    The cases of Dinwiddie v. Cox, La.App., ; , ; and Martin v. Schwing Lumber & Shingle Co., 228 La.
  • Tinsley v. Seismic Explorations, Inc. 117 So. 2d 897 La. 1960
    wherein was involved the effect of our laws of registry, it was -contended that under these laws a mineral lessee had, by virtue of Act 205 of 1938, acquired a greater right than an ordinary lessee.
  • Watson v. Crown-Zellerbach Corp. 110 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    759 ; , ; Moore Planting Co., Ltd. v. Morgan’s Louisiana & T. R. & S. S. Co., 126 La.
  • Reagan v. Murphy 105 So. 2d 210 La. 1958
    the defendant mineral lessees contended that they were entitled to rely on the law of registry and that, by virtue of it, had acquired a greater right than an ordinary lessee in view of Act 205 of 1938.
  • Wells v. Joseph 101 So. 2d 667 La. 1958
    and, , “ * * * where such an instrument contains language that fairly puts a purchaser on inquiry as to the title and he does not *789 avail himself of the means and facilities at hand to obtain knowledge of the true facts he is to be considered as having bought at his own risk and peril” , (on rehearing), is full authority for the proposition that parties relying on the law of registry and claiming under recorded muniments of title cannot ignore the facts revealed by the public records.
  • Bel v. Manuel 99 So. 2d 58 La. 1958
  • Boyet v. Brushwood Methodist Church 98 So. 2d 593 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    In this connection, -103 , 48 So.
  • Hodgeson v. McDaniel 96 So. 2d 481 La. 1957
  • Winn v. Calhoun 94 So. 2d 545 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    “In all cases where the thing sold remains in the possession of the seller, because he has reserved to himself the usufruct, or retains possession by a precarious title, there is reason to presume that the sale is simulated, and with respect to third persons, the parties must produce proof that they are acting in good faith, and establish the reality of the sale.” In Arnold v. Sun Oil Co., 1949, , , the Supreme Court discussed its opinions in Roe v. Bundy’s Heirs, 1893, 45 La.Ann.
  • Bruce v. Cheramie 93 So. 2d 202 La. 1956
    Keller v. Summers, supra; , ; Richardson & Bass v. Board of Levee Commissioners, 226 La.
  • Wait v. Pearson 88 So. 2d 43 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    759 , , , at pages 383-387.
  • Ryan v. Ribbeck 83 So. 2d 650 La. 1955
    1019 , and cases there cited; , .
  • Alba v. Smith 81 So. 2d 863 La. 1955
    735 ; , ; Lee v. Jones, 224 La.