Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Hawthorne v. Hawthorne, 39 So. 2d 338.
-
Short v. Fink
372 So. 2d 705
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
365 , ; , ; Chapman v. Chapman, supra; Davidson v. Jenkins, La.App., ; Smith v. Smith, La.App., ; Reynolds v. Reynolds, La.App., .
-
Bruner v. Bruner
364 So. 2d 1015
La. 1978
365 , ; , ; Chapman v. Chapman [La.App., ], supra; Davidson v. Jenkins, La.App.
-
Carter v. Carter
316 So. 2d 829
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
117 , (1953); , (1949); (La.App.
-
Vetter v. Vetter
299 So. 2d 899
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
237 , ; , ; Bowsky v. Silverman, 184 La.
-
Kennedy v. Kennedy
261 So. 2d 657
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
237 , ; , ; Bowsky v. Silverman, 184 La.
-
Adler v. Adler
239 So. 2d 494
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1970
365 , ; , ; Chapman v. Chapman, supra ; Davidson v. Jenkins, La.App., ; Smith v. Smith, La.App., ; Reynolds v. Reynolds, La.App., .
-
Gautreaux v. Gautreaux
220 So. 2d 249
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Haw11 , ; Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
-
Sachse v. Sachse
150 So. 2d 772
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
cited and relied upon by counsel for defendant is authority for the principle that where a wife is found to be of equal fault a judgment denying her permanent alimony will not be disturbed upon appeal.
-
Moreau v. Moreau
142 So. 2d 423
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
-
Chapman v. Chapman
130 So. 2d 811
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
Davieson v. Trapp, 223 La.
-
Vicknair v. Vicknair
112 So. 2d 702
La. 1959
673 , ; , ; Smith v. Smith, 217 La.
- Kendrick v. Kendrick 106 So. 2d 707 La. 1958
-
Davieson v. Trapp
66 So. 2d 804
La. 1953
mony under that Article of the Code, claiming that the separation was brought about solely and exclusively by the fault of the husband, from which, of course, the only logical inference-to be drawn is that she was not at fault, or, as is stated in some of the cases, that she was “free from fault.” , , 339: “Here the element essential for the obtaining of permanent alimony is that the wife must show that she was free from fault and she must prove her allegations with reasonable certainty.” The is
-
Creel v. Creel
49 So. 2d 617
La. 1950
673 , ; , and Williams v. Williams, 215 La.