Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite State v. Roberts, 35 So. 2d 216.

14 citing documents.

  • State v. Brown 163 So. 3d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2013
    tant case that a verdict of simple assault is responsive to the charge of attempted, simple kidnapping, it was reasoned that ‘ * * * all that is required is that the greater offense must include all the elements of the lesser offense in order to make a verdict of the lesser offense responsive.’ We now find that this statement is not entirely accurate for, as we observed in the [State v] Roberts [ , (1948)] case, the test is whether the definition of the greater offense necessarily includes all t
  • State v. Rideau 947 So. 2d 127 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 2006
    (1948), the Louisiana Supreme Court stated: Thus, it is plain from the definitions of attempted murder and aggravated battery that the elements of the lesser offense are not necessarily included in the greater offense.
  • State v. Byrd 491 So. 2d 87 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1986
    Thus, , (1948), ‘the elements of the crime of attempted murder are specific intent to kill a human being and an overt act in furtherance of the object.’ It has, therefore, universally and without exception been held in American jurisdictions that a specific intent to kill is an essential element of the cri
  • State v. Simmons 422 So. 2d 138 La. 1982
    14:5; on rehearing; , (1948).
  • State v. St. Amant 413 So. 2d 1312 La. 1981
  • State v. Dauzat 392 So. 2d 393 La. 1980
  • State v. Booker 385 So. 2d 1186 La. 1980
    606 , (1948); , (1948); cf. La.R.S.
  • State v. McCoy 337 So. 2d 192 La. 1976
  • State v. Butler 322 So. 2d 189 La. 1975
    Thus, , (1948), "the elements of the crime of attempted murder are specific intent to kill a human being (Article 30, Criminal Code) and an overt act in furtherance of the object."
  • State v. Peterson 290 So. 2d 307 La. 1974
    (1948) (aggravated battery not responsive to charge of attempted murder) and State v. Clayton, 236 La.
  • State v. Garner 115 So. 2d 855 La. 1959
    1003 , ; , ; State v. Espinosa, 223 La.
  • State v. Clayton 110 So. 2d 111 La. 1959
  • State v. Robinson 58 So. 2d 408 La. 1952
    we said: “Comparison of the provisions of Articles 386, 405 and 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and Article 5 of the Criminal Code * * * with the prior jurisprudence discloses that the former are in reality a codification of the well-settled pronouncements of this court relative to greater
  • State v. Poe 38 So. 2d 359 La. 1948
    A rehearing was granted in this case for the purpose of considering whether the ruling that a verdict of simple assault is responsive to a , , which was handed down on the same day.