DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Long-Bell Petroleum Co. v. Tritico, 43 So. 2d 782.

32 citing documents.

  • Horton v. Mobley 578 So. 2d 977 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1991
  • Texaco v. Newton & Rosa Smith Charitable Trust 471 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1985
    31:24; , (1949); Bourg v. Hebert, 224 La.
  • Allied Chemical Corp. v. Dye 441 So. 2d 776 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1983
    669 (1923); , (1949); Starr Davis Oil Co. v. Webber, 218 La.
  • John Bailey Contr. v. St., Dept. of Tr. & Dev. 439 So. 2d 1055 La. 1983
    See also, Polozola v. Garlock, Inc., , (La.1977); Long-Bell Petroleum Col., , (1949), reh.
  • Wall v. Leger 402 So. 2d 704 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
    31:24; Bourg v. Hebert, supra ; , (1949).
  • Hawthorne Oil & Gas Corp. v. Continental Oil Co. 368 So. 2d 726 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1979
    (1949); Leiter Minerals, Inc. v. California Company, 241 La.
  • Norris v. Allstate Insurance Company 293 So. 2d 918 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1974
    See Civil Code, Articles 1764, 1945-1962; , and cases cited at 454, .
  • Crow v. Southern Natural Gas Company 210 So. 2d 596 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1968
    (1949); Reuter v. Reuter's Succession, 206 La.
  • Franks Petroleum v. J. E. Hobbs 200 So. 2d 708 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    915 , , and Long-Bell Petroleum Co., Inc. v. Tritico (on rehearing), , .” Concededly the principal purpose of Act 315 of 1940 was designed to prevent the acquisition by the United States of mineral rights which constitute valuable natural resources of the State of Louisiana.
  • State, Sabine River Authority v. Salter 184 So. 2d 783 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1966
    207 ; , , and authorities there cited.
  • Gauthier v. Magee 141 So. 2d 837 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
    McKinney v. American Security Life Insurance Co., La.App., ; , 43 So.
  • Gunter v. Lord 140 So. 2d 11 La. 1962
    See Civil Code, Articles 1764, 1945-1962; , and cases cited at 454, .
  • Chicago Mill and Lumber Co. v. Ayer Timber Co. 131 So. 2d 635 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Salling's Heirs, 150 La.
  • Phillips Petroleum Company v. Richard 127 So. 2d 816 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
    502 , ; , ; Sanders v. Flowers, 218 La.
  • Hodges v. Long-Bell Petroleum Company 121 So. 2d 831 La. 1960
    207 ; , , and authorities there cited.
  • Clark v. Reed 122 So. 2d 344 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1960
    Long-Bell Petroleum Co., Inc., v. Tritico, , ; Goldsmith v. McCoy, 190 La.
  • McGuffy v. Weil 120 So. 2d 358 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    Long-Bell Petroleum Co., Inc., v. Tritico, , ; Goldsmith v. McCoy, 190 La.
  • Gulf Oil Corporation v. Clement 118 So. 2d 361 La. 1960
    183 , and Long-Bell Petroleum Co., , .
  • Union Oil & Gas Corp. of Louisiana v. Broussard 112 So. 2d 96 La. 1959
    915 , , and Long Bell Petroleum Co. v. Tritico (on rehearing), , .” See also Long-Bell Lumber Co. v. Granger, 222 La.
  • Hinchee v. Long Bell Petroleum Co. 103 So. 2d 84 La. 1958
    See Long-Bell Petroleum Company, Inc., v. Tritico, , , and Long-Bell Lumber Company v. Granger, 222 La.
  • Jantz v. Long Bell Petroleum Co. 86 So. 2d 918 La. 1956
    To agree with this view would necessitate the court’s overruling of the Supreme Court’s holding (on rehearing) in the case of Long-Bell Petroleum Company, , , and that, of course, a district court cannot do, even if it had any desire to do so, which this court doesn’t have.
  • Smith v. Anisman 85 So. 2d 351 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1956
  • Perkins v. Long-Bell Petroleum Company 81 So. 2d 389 La. 1955
    The evidence shows that plaintiff, although contending (since the decision in Long-Bell Petroleum Co., Inc., v. Tritico, , until Long-Bell Lumber Co. v. Granger, 222 La.
  • Delta Refining Co. v. Bankhead 73 So. 2d 302 La. 1954
    LSA-Civil Code, Articles 743, 766, 770; Long-Bell Petroleum Co. v. Tritico, on rehearing, , .
  • Hicks v. Clark 72 So. 2d 322 La. 1954
    On the other hand, in Long-Bell Petroleum Co., Inc., v. Tritico, , ; *137 McMurrey v. Gray, 216 La.
  • Horn v. Skelly Oil Co. 70 So. 2d 657 La. 1954
    502 , ; , ; Sanders v. Flowers, 218 La.
  • Bourg v. Hebert 70 So. 2d 116 La. 1953
    915 , ; Long-Bell Petroleum Co., Inc., v. Tritico, , .
  • Long-Bell Lumber Co. v. Granger 63 So. 2d 420 La. 1952
    In the comparatively recent case of Long-Bell Petroleum Co., , (on the rehearing, not on the original hearing), we considered the same 1936 mineral deed' on which -these defendants now rely, and we concluded that by it no servitude was created since Petroleum Company, the vendee, already owned a servitude resulting from the 1931 mineral sale.
  • Wise v. Watkins 62 So. 2d 653 La. 1952
    LSA-Civil Code, Articles 743, 766, 770; Long-Bell Petroleum Co. v. Tritico, on rehearing, , 43 So.
  • Starr Davis Oil Co. v. Webber 48 So. 2d 906 La. 1950
  • Liberty Farms, Inc. v. Miller 45 So. 2d 610 La. 1950
    915 , and Long-Bell Petroleum Co. Inc. v. Tritico (on rehearing), , .
  • McMurrey v. Gray 45 So. 2d 73 La. 1949
    * * * ” *915 We might further point out that the trial judge’s conclusion is supported by the recent decision of this court in Long-Bell Petroleum Co., Inc., , in which this court pointed out that, in order for one making a reservation of a mineral right thus to create a new servitude, the one making the reservation must of necessity be the owner of the right at the time the reservation is made.