Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Cheramie v. Stiles, 41 So. 2d 502.

21 citing documents.

O'NEAL v. Chris Steak House, Inc. 525 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1988
[6] , (1949); Bonfanti Marine, (La.App.
Reed v. Verwoerdt 490 So. 2d 421 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
1819, 1821 (pre-1985); , (1949).
Remn Const. Corp. v. Keating 478 So. 2d 207 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
SANDERS'CAMPER VIL., INC. v. Coleman Oldsmobile, Inc. 418 So. 2d 679 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1982
Pharis & Pharis v. Rayner 406 So. 2d 723 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1981
art. 1821 provides as follows: “That is called error of fact, which proceeds either from ignorance of that which really exists, or from a mistaken belief in the existence of that which has none.” , (1949), it was held that: “The existence of an error of fact proceeding from ignorance of what really exists or the mistaken belief in the existence of facts which are the principal cause of and bear upon the motive for the yielding of consent to an agreement are sufficient grounds to set aside a cont
Myles v. Louisiana Power & Light Co. 375 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
Civil Code Articles 1819, 1821, 1823, 1825 and 1845; , ; Gibert v. Cook, La.App., ; McCarty v. Anderson, La.App., .
St. John the Baptist Parish Police Jury v. Louisiana & Arkansas Railway Co. 368 So. 2d 756 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1979
(1949); Luria Brothers & Co., writ refused 254 La.
Leachman v. El Dorado Poultry Co. 342 So. 2d 1224 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
Custom Builders & Supply, Inc. v. Revels 310 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1975
Humble Oil & Refining Company v. Chappuis 239 So. 2d 400 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1970
(1949) the plaintiff employed the defendant attorney to secure cancellation of a mineral lease.
Office Center, Inc. v. Tanenbaum 225 So. 2d 740 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
848 , (1954); , (1949); (La.App.
Luria Bros. & Co. v. Capitol Steel, Inc. 225 So. 2d 630 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
Cheramie v. Stiles (1949) , ; LSA-C.C.
Pittman Construction Co. v. Housing Authority of New Orleans 183 So. 2d 343 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
Laborde v. Aymond, 172 La.
Bailey v. Alice C. Plantation & Refinery Inc. 152 So. 2d 336 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1963
736 , (1950); See also, , (1949) and Pan American Production Co. v. Robichaux, supra.
McNabb v. Foodtown, Inc. 143 So. 2d 144 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
Prestridge v. Humble Oil & Refining Company 131 So. 2d 810 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1961
97 , ; , ; Breland v. Humphries, La.App., ; Tracy v. Dufrene, 240 La.
Clement v. Sneed Bros. 121 So. 2d 235 La. 1960
The offer and the acceptance must have the characteristics of a bargain and must be conventional counterparts.’ * * * ” , , wherein we said: “ ‘Contracts are founded on the agreements, not on the disagreements, of the parties.
Johnson v. Wilson 118 So. 2d 450 La. 1960
332 , ; , and Loew’s Inc. v. Don George, 227 La.
Loew's, Inc. v. Don George, Inc. 78 So. 2d 534 La. 1955
Carpenter v. Skinner 71 So. 2d 133 La. 1954
See, , ; McCarty v. Anderson, La.App., , writs refused; Guerin Theater Seating System, Inc. v. Guerin, 163 La.
McCarty v. Anderson 58 So. 2d 255 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1952
stated: "(2) Moreover, the contract cannot be given effect because there was an error of fact as to the principal cause and motive for making the contract.