Cited by
Opinions in Louisiana that cite Walsh v. Walsh, 42 So. 2d 860.
-
Amanda Cousin Versus Michael Cousin
La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 2021
451, (1952); So.2d 860 (1949); Rouse v. Rouse, 219 La.
-
Hemavathy v. Shivashankara
782 So. 2d 115
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 2001
451 , (1952); , (1949); Rouse v. Rouse, 219 La.
- Butler v. Reeder 632 So. 2d 401 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1994
-
Gardebled v. Georgia Pacific Corp.
506 So. 2d 576
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1987
94 ; , ; Coltraro v. Chotin, 1 La.App.
- Fanguy v. Pumilia 498 So. 2d 71 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1986
- Clay v. Clay 467 So. 2d 166 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1985
- Bush v. Lee 443 So. 2d 702 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1983
- Airhart v. Manale 428 So. 2d 1179 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1983
- West v. Gajdzik 425 So. 2d 263 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1982
-
Peschier v. Peschier
419 So. 2d 923
La. 1982
451 , (1952); , (1949); Rouse v. Rouse, 219 La.
- Smith v. Cajun Insulation, Inc. 392 So. 2d 398 La. 1980
-
DOZIER, ETC. v. Burleigh
380 So. 2d 197
La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
See State v. Sommerville, supra; , (1949), cert.
- Johnson v. Jones-Journet 320 So. 2d 533 La. 1975
-
American Supply Co. of Morgan City, Inc. v. Petrolane Offshore Construction Services, Inc.
289 So. 2d 356
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1949); (1st La.App., 1955).
-
Johnston v. Smith
284 So. 2d 149
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
216 (1921); Succession of Gilmore, supra; , 42 So.
-
Young v. Warner
283 So. 2d 547
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1973
(1949), certiorari denied, 339 U.S. 914 , 70 S.Ct.
-
Tannehill v. Tannehill
261 So. 2d 619
La. 1972
Since the party attacking the judgment has the burden to prove its nullity ( , ; Gennusa v. Gennusa, 189 La.
-
West Publishing Co. v. Intrastate Pipeline Corp.
254 So. 2d 643
La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
Alleman v. Guillot, La.App., 225 So.
-
Tannehill v. Tannehill
247 So. 2d 870
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1971
(1949) the court held in a similar situation : “That judgment, even though it was taken by default, is presumptively correct and plaintiff, who is now seeking to have it vacated, carries the burden of proving a lack of jurisdiction of the Court which does not appear on the face of the record as the proc
- Biri v. Biri 192 So. 2d 862 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1966
-
Dare v. Myrick
168 So. 2d 845
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
94 (1924); , (1949); Alonso v. Bowers, 222 La.
-
Tapp v. Guaranty Finance Company
158 So. 2d 228
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
94 ; , ; Coltraro v. Chotin, 1 La.App.
-
Hall v. Hall
127 So. 2d 347
La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
Miller v. Miller, supra; State ex rel.
-
Vegas v. Cheramie
80 So. 2d 880
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
94 ; , ; Coltraro v. Chotin, 1 La.App.
-
Romero v. Galley
79 So. 2d 625
La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
864 .'" It is well settled that a , 42 So.
-
Accardo v. Dimiceli
76 So. 2d 521
La. 1954
But, , , “ * * * this does not mean that the action of nullity performs the office of an appeal or that it can be used to set aside a final judgment where-there is no showing of mischief or imposition, merely because the judgment was rendered by default”.
- Cryer v. Cryer 70 So. 2d 752 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
-
Alonso v. Bowers
64 So. 2d 443
La. 1953
94 ; , ; Coltraro v. Chotin, 1 La.App.
- Wilson v. Calvin 59 So. 2d 451 La. 1952