DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite Coney v. Coney, 41 So. 2d 497.

13 citing documents.

  • State v. Watson 403 So. 2d 1249 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1981
    (1949), the Supreme Court held that alimony pendente lite was only due and payable from the date of judicial demand.
  • Richard v. Richard 359 So. 2d 696 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1978
    (1949) "that alimony pendente lite is only due and payable from the date of judicial demand".
  • Jackson v. Jackson 322 So. 2d 800 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1975
  • Nelson v. Nelson 311 So. 2d 268 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
  • In re Greene 300 So. 2d 516 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1974
  • Cumpton v. Cumpton 283 So. 2d 846 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1973
    *848 EFFECTIVE DATE FOR COMMENCEMENT OF ALIMONY In support of her position that payment of alimony should begin on April 17, 1972, the date she filed her petition demanding this relief, , (1949), (La.App.
  • Nolte v. Nolte 258 So. 2d 118 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    (1949); Stevens v. Stevens, La.App., (1st Cir. 1968).
  • Stansbury v. Stansbury 258 So. 2d 170 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
  • Coney v. Coney 89 So. 2d 326 La. 1956
  • Richards v. Garth 65 So. 2d 109 La. 1953
    121 ; , ; and Smith v. Smith, 217 La.
  • Leager v. Leager 62 So. 2d 492 La. 1952
  • Coney v. Coney 56 So. 2d 841 La. 1951
    See: , , wherein we affirmed an award of alimony pendente lite made by the district court; Coney v. Coney, 217 La.
  • Coney v. Coney 56 So. 2d 841 La. 1951
    See: , , wherein we affirmed an award of alimony pendente lite made by the district court; Coney v. Coney, 217 La.