DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite J. B. Beaird Co. v. Burris Bros., 44 So. 2d 693.

44 citing documents.

  • Te-Mamou Water District v. Pelts & Skins Export, Ltd. 771 So. 2d 777 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 2000
    44 |aSo.2d 693 (1949), the supreme court distinguished between a defendant who uses a demand for reduction in price as a weapon of attack and one who uses the same demand as a shield or defense in resisting the payment of the balance of the purchase price; ■ the latter is not precluded by a plea of prescription.
  • C & M Contractors, Inc. v. Team Persuasion Enterprises, Inc. 779 So. 2d 1 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1999
  • Bo-Pic Foods, Inc. v. POLYFLEX FILM AND CONVERTING 665 So. 2d 787 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1995
  • Kaiser v. Garrus 617 So. 2d 107 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1993
  • MTU of North America, Inc. v. Raven Marine, Inc. 603 So. 2d 803 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1992
    Beaird Co., , (1949); Stratton-Baldwin Co., (La.App.
  • Parker v. Dubus Engine Co. 563 So. 2d 355 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1990
    Beaird & , (1949); (La.App.
  • Chance v. Stevens of Leesville, Inc. 491 So. 2d 116 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1986
    (1949); Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., Ltd., 157 La.
  • Dumond v. Houma Toyota, Inc.-AMC Jeep, Inc. 470 So. 2d 484 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    Beaird Co., Inc. v. Burris Bros., Ltd., , (1949); Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., Ltd., 157 La.
  • Moses v. Ed's Manufactured Housing, Inc. 470 So. 2d 935 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1985
    (1949); Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., Ltd., 157 La.
  • Bourne v. Rein Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. 463 So. 2d 1356 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1984
    Beaird Co., , (1950); Stratton-Baldwin Co., (La.App.
  • Dickerson v. Begnaud Motors, Inc. 446 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1984
    Beaird Co., Inc. v. Burris Bros., Ltd., , (1949); Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., Ltd., 157 La.
  • Vance v. Emerson 420 So. 2d 1032 La. Ct. App. 5th Cir. 1982
    Bland C., Inc., v. Burris Bros. Limited, , (1950).
  • Anselmo v. Chrysler Corporation 414 So. 2d 872 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1982
    (1949); Crawford v. Abbot Automobile Co., Ltd., 157 La.
  • Lokey v. Dixie Buick, Inc. 400 So. 2d 322 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1981
    (1949); Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., Ltd., 157 La.
  • Dixon Enterprises, Inc. v. Restaurant Products, Inc. 389 So. 2d 859 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1980
    (1949); Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., Ltd., 157 La.
  • John Deere Indus. Equip. Co. v. Willett Timber Co. 380 So. 2d 182 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1980
    (1949); Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., Ltd., 157 La.
  • Stratton-Baldwin Co., Inc. v. Brown 343 So. 2d 292 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1977
    J. B. Beaird Co., , (1950).
  • Ticheli v. Silmon 304 So. 2d 792 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1974
  • Rey v. Cuccia 298 So. 2d 840 La. 1974
    (1949); Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., Ltd., 157 La.
  • Prince v. Paretti Pontiac Company, Inc. 281 So. 2d 112 La. 1973
    [7] See, J. B. Beaird Co., Inc. v. Burris Bros., Ltd., , (1949): Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., Ltd., 157 La.
  • Mire v. Magnifique Volkswagen, Inc. 274 So. 2d 463 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1973
  • Lee v. Blanchard 264 So. 2d 364 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1972
    Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., 157 La.
  • Peters v. Pattison Pontiac Co. 259 So. 2d 99 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1972
    (1949); Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., 157 La.
  • Richardson v. French 253 So. 2d 602 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1971
    See also Stevens v. Daigle and Hinson Rambler, Inc., , (1950); and Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., 157 La.
  • D. H. Holmes Co. v. Smith 235 So. 2d 159 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    (1949); Continental-Emsco Co. v. D & D Drilling Co., (La.App.
  • Zeringue v. Maxon Premix Burner Co. 232 So. 2d 861 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
  • Rogers v. Labarama, Inc. 233 So. 2d 348 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1970
    Capella v. Taulli, La.App., .” See also Continental-Emsco Co. v. D & D Drilling Co., La.App., .
  • Minot Hooper Co. v. Crowley Industrial Bag Co. 217 So. 2d 653 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1969
    Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., 157 La.
  • Stumpf v. Metairie Motor Sales, Inc. 212 So. 2d 705 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1968
    denied); J. B. Beaird Co. v. Burris Bros., supra [ , ]; Charles A. Kaufman Co. v. Gillman, La.App.Orl., 142 So.
  • Continental-Emsco Co. v. D & D Drilling Co. 201 So. 2d 873 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Art 424; , ; Charter Company, Inc. v. Mercante, La.App.
  • Ditta v. Polk Chevrolet, Inc. 196 So. 2d 672 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1967
    Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., 157 La.
  • Charter Co. v. Mercante 186 So. 2d 430 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1966
    Capella v. Taulli, La.App., .
  • Glenn v. Caire 164 So. 2d 656 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1964
    Crawford v. Abbott Automobile Co., 157 La.
  • Harris v. Automatic Enterprises of Louisiana, Inc. 145 So. 2d 335 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1962
  • Goff v. Dewey Olivier, Inc. 137 So. 2d 393 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1962
    This case was cited with approval in J. B. Beaird Co., Inc. v. Burris Bros., Ltd. (1949), , , and Aubry v. Todd (La.App., 2 Cir., 1951), 55 So.
  • Madere v. Sharp 89 So. 2d 214 La. 1956
  • Von Zonneveld Bros. & Philippo v. Cary 86 So. 2d 252 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    Here, as in J. B. Beaird Co., Inc., v. Burris Bros., Limited, , , the buyer is not bringing the action, which would prescribe after one year from the date of the sale, provided no defects were known, but is the defendant, and when a buyer uses a demand for a reduction in the price on the ground of the breach of warranty as a defense for an action for the balanc
  • Le Blanc v. Rock 84 So. 2d 629 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    172 , likewise for such reasons purchasers can avoid liability for the balance of the purchase price; see J. B. Beaird Co., Inc., v. Burris Bros., Ltd., , .
  • Williams v. Shadow 77 So. 2d 48 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    2d 276 ; J. B. Beaird Company, Inc., v. Burris Brothers, 1949-1950, , ; Bonnette v. Ponthieux, La.App., 1949, ; Levy and Company v. Pierce, La.App., 1949, ; Kuhlmann v. Purpera, La.App., 1947, ; Henderson v. Leona Rice Milling Company, 1926, 160 La.
  • United Engineering Co. of Louisiana v. Durbin 68 So. 2d 614 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1953
    e and contends that the appellant's objection to the parol evidence was without merit as it was not to change the written instrument but to show that the warranty implied in all sales that the article purchased will be fit for its intended purpose was lacking in this particular case, and he cites Article 2520 of the LSA-Civil Code, Article 2541, and Article 2542; , ; Hemenway, Inc., v. Roach, La.App., 175 So.
  • J. E. Beaird Co. v. Burris Bros. 63 So. 2d 4 La. 1953
    I am of the opinion that the purchase price should not be reduced to any extent, my reasons therefor having been assigned when the case was here previously, , .
  • Aubry v. Todd 55 So. 2d 276 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    We think the law applicable to this case is well summed up by Justice Ponder in J. B. Beaird Co., Inc., v. Burris Bros., Ltd., , , 697: The machine was undoubtedly defective because so many replacements were made in an attempt to step up the production.
  • Andries v. Nelson 46 So. 2d 333 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
  • Dileo v. Dileo 46 So. 2d 53 La. 1950
    1 , and authorities there cited and J. B. Beaird Company, Inc. v. Burris Brothers, Limited, La.Sup., .