DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Louisiana that cite White v. City of Alexandria, 43 So. 2d 618.

80 citing documents.

  • Dartez v. City of Sulphur 179 So. 2d 482 La. Ct. App. 3d Cir. 1965
  • Turner v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company 175 So. 2d 304 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
    (1949); , La.App., 2d Cir. 1963 (writ refused); , La.App., Orleans 1955; , La.App., 2d Cir.1954; , La.App., Orleans
  • Green v. Acosta 173 So. 2d 291 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
  • Escardille v. City of New Orleans 175 So. 2d 404 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1965
    425 , ; *406 , ; (cert, den.); Bodenheimer v. City of New Orleans, La.App., (cert.
  • Spinks v. GENERAL FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, NY 175 So. 2d 339 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1965
    (1949); , La.App., 2d Cir. 1963 (writ refused); , La.App., Orleans 1955; , La.App., 2d Cir. 1954; , La.App., Orleans
  • Tete v. Newark Insurance Company 170 So. 2d 248 La. Ct. App. 4th Cir. 1964
  • St. Paul v. MacKenroth 165 So. 2d 273 La. 1964
    this Court found that there is no fixed rule for making such a determination; the facts and surrounding circumstances of each particular case control.
  • Ford v. City of Shreveport 165 So. 2d 325 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    See, also: Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc., et al., supra; , .
  • Aicklen v. Franz 160 So. 2d 857 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1964
    LaCava, Sr. v. City of New Orleans, La.App., ; Hamilton v. City of Monroe, La.App., ; Hudgens v. City of New Orleans, La.App., ; Massicot v. City of New Orleans, La.App., ; Bodenheimer v. City of New Orleans, La.App., .
  • Youngblood v. Newspaper Production Company 158 So. 2d 432 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1964
    Hamilton v. City of Monroe, La.App.
  • Lee v. City of Baton Rouge 147 So. 2d 868 La. 1962
    and Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, 219 La.
  • Distinguished Matthews v. F. Miller & Sons, Inc. 146 So. 2d 522 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    In support of this contention, , ; and, Massicot v. City of New Orleans, (La.App., Orl., 1950), .
  • Sharp v. City of New Orleans 144 So. 2d 6 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1962
    In the case of White v. City of Alexandria, 1949, , , the Supreme Court set forth the legal principles involved in this type of case: “From this jurisprudence there have evolved certain legal principles which are to be considered in determining the instant controversy.
  • Cook v. City of Shreveport 134 So. 2d 582 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1961
    These principles have evolved from numerous cases, a , (1949), in which Justice Hamiter summarizes their several holdings.
  • Bond v. City of Baton Rouge 129 So. 2d 887 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1961
    620: "From this jurisprudence there have evolved certain legal principles which are to be considered in determining the instant controversy.
  • Toppi v. Arbour 119 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1960
    620: "For determining what is a dangerous defect in a sidewalk (that which renders the municipality responsible in damages to a pedestrian injured as a consequence thereof) there is no fixed rule; the facts and surrounding circumstances of each particular case control.
  • Carlisle v. Parish of East Baton Rouge 114 So. 2d 62 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1959
    A municipal government must keep its streets and sidewalks reasonably safe, but "to render it liable in damages the defect complained of must be dangerous or calculated to cause injury"; those defects "that are not in the nature of traps, or from which danger cannot reasonably be anticipated, provide no actionable negligence," , .
  • Ward Baking Co. v. City of New Orleans 94 So. 2d 720 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1957
    See White v. City of Alexandria, 1949, , .
  • Dauner v. Liberty Mutual Insurance 90 So. 2d 877 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1956
    In the relatively recent case of White v. City of Alexandria, 1949, , , the Supreme Court, after citing innumerable decisions forming the pattern for the existing jurisprudence of this.
  • Merchant v. Montgomery Ward & Company 83 So. 2d 920 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    Defendant relies on: , ; Birth v. City of New Orleans, La.App., ; Hamilton v. City of Monroe, La.App., ; Robertson v. Coal Operators, La.App.
  • Corkern v. Travelers Insurance Co. 80 So. 2d 885 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    425 ; Cato v. City of New Orleans [La.App.], ; Rodriguez v. City of Sulphur [La.App.], ; , .” *887 The substantial issues to be resolved are: (1) When, as alleged and as the evidence reflects, the Smith-Sweger Construction Company dug its trench in the concrete sidewalk on Railroad Avenue, Morgan City, Louisiana, hut left a pathway composed of broken pieces of concrete and dirt through this t
  • Birth v. City of New Orleans 77 So. 2d 233 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1955
    343 ; Massicot v. City of New Orleans, La.App., ; , .
  • Hamilton v. City of Monroe 72 So. 2d 576 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    wherein plaintiff in the nighttime sustained injuries in an accident from a defect in a sidewalk in the middle of a city block, which was unlighted and without warnings or lights of any kind to indicate to pedestrians the existence of a dangerous fetep-up in the sidewalk, the Supreme Court, citin
  • Hughes v. Sewerage & Water Board of New Orleans 70 So. 2d 760 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1954
    In the relatively, recent case of White v. City of Alexandria, 1949, , , the Supreme Court, after citing numerous decisions forming the pattern of the existing jurisprudence of this state encompassing sidewalk accidents, set forth composite legal principles emanating therefrom which are appropriate herein in determining the liability of both municipal corporations: “F
  • Preuett v. STATE DEPT. OF HIGHWAYS 62 So. 2d 686 La. Ct. App. 2d Cir. 1953
    It is urged on behalf of defendant that the existence of a defect in a highway that may cause an accident will not sustain a charge of negligence if the highway is reasonably safe in spite of the existence of the defect, , ; Millstead v. City of New Orleans, La.App., 146 So.
  • Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc. 55 So. 2d 239 La. 1951
    we cited numerous decisions in the jurisprudence of this state concerning sidewalk accidents and then set forth the following legal principles evolving therefrom which are appropriate in determining a municipality’s responsibility.
  • Hudgens v. City of New Orleans 54 So. 2d 536 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1951
    Parker v. City of New Orleans, La.App., .
  • Arata v. Orleans Capitol Stores, Inc. 47 So. 2d 119 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    So.2d 618; Massicot v. City of New Orleans, La.App., and the cases cited therein.
  • Byrnes v. National Casualty Co. 45 So. 2d 408 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    the Supreme Court, as expressed in syllabus No. 3, said: "A pedestrian is entitled to assume that the sidewalks are not dangerous and is not required constantly to observe the surface of the walk or to exercise the care that would be necessary in traversing a jungle, but he must exercise ordinary care
  • Massicot v. CITY OF NEW ORELANS 43 So. 2d 621 La. Ct. App. 1st Cir. 1950
    ___, , the Court, after citing numerous cases involving sidewalk accidents, said: "* * * Thus, a municipality * * must keep the sidewalks reasonably safe, but the maintaining of them in perfect condition is not necessary.